- 1、本文档共34页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人力资源双语ch09 performanceappraisal
Common Appraisal Problems Unclear Standards Halo Effect Bias Leniency or Strictness Central Tendency 4. Appraisal Problems 4. Appraisal Problems Unclear standards 绩效标准不明确 An appraisal that is too open to interpretation. A Graphic Rating Scale with Unclear Standards Note: For example, what exactly is meant by “good,” “excellent”, and so forth? Potential Appraisal Problems Halo effect 晕轮效应 Occur when a supervisor’s rating of a subordinate on one trait biases the rating of that person on other traits. Central tendency 居中趋势 A tendency to rate all employees the same way, such as rating them all average. Strictness/leniency 过严或过宽 The problem that occurs when a supervisor has a tendency to rate all subordinates either high or low. Bias 个人偏见 The tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal ratings employees receive. 5. How to Avoid Appraisal Problems Learn and understand the potential problems, and the solutions for each. Use the right appraisal tool. Each tool has its own pros and cons. Train supervisors to reduce rating errors such as halo, leniency, and central tendency. Have raters compile positive and negative critical incidents as they occur. 6. Appraisal feedback interview Supervisor and subordinate review the appraisal and make plans to remedy deficiencies and reinforce strengths . Key Terms performance appraisal graphic rating scale alternation ranking method paired comparison method forced distribution method critical incident method behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS) management by objectives(MBO) unclear standards halo effect central tendency strictness/leniency bias appraisal interview * * Prentice Hall, ? 2003 Prentice Hall, ? 2003 Prentice Hall, ? 2003 ? 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Prentice Hall, ? 2003 ? 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Performance management and appraisal Chapter 9 ? 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 8–* When you finish studyin
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 数据中心算力技术要求和测评方法.pdf VIP
- 港口起重机驾驶操作训练仿真模拟器技术方案(纯方案,109页港口起重机驾驶操作训练仿真模拟器技术方案.pdf VIP
- 青海水库工程标准化管理工作手册编制指南、管理、制度、操作手册示范文本、管理设施与标识导视系统建设与维护指引、小型水库运行管理技术指南.docx VIP
- DEC-OGP-S-AC-010-2020-1油气管道工程辐射交联聚乙烯热收缩带(套)及补伤片.pdf VIP
- 风险投资PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 二级综合医院评审标准(2025年版)实施细则.docx VIP
- 焊接裂纹产生原因及预防措施.doc VIP
- 公司筹备期间财务报销流程制度.doc VIP
- 证件领用登记表.doc VIP
- T_WHECA 002—2025(建设项目全过程工程咨询服务指南).pdf VIP
文档评论(0)