经皮引导抽出钢丝法在锤状指中应用价值分析.docVIP

经皮引导抽出钢丝法在锤状指中应用价值分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经皮引导抽出钢丝法在锤状指中应用价值分析

经皮引导抽出钢丝法在锤状指中应用价值分析   [摘要] 目的 分析?皮引导抽出钢丝法在锤状指中的应用价值。 方法 将28例符合本研究各项标准的锤状指患者纳入研究,均采用经皮引导抽出钢丝法治疗。采用Crawford评分进行治疗前后锤状指功能客观评估;采用Buck-Gramcko分值进行治疗后患者主观疗效评估。对比治疗前后Crawford优良率和不同分期分型组Crawford优良率;记录治疗后Buck-Gramcko优良率;记录并发症和复发例数。对2例典型病例进行分析。 结果 治疗后Crawford优良率从14.29%提高至89.29%(P0.05);治疗后主观评分Buck-Gramcko分值为(53.20±3.52)分,优良率为92.86%;无并发症和复发病例,2例典型病例锤状指治疗后功能明显改善。 结论 经皮引导抽出钢丝法治疗锤状指能显著改善客观功能评分和主观疗效评分,改善患指屈伸功能,提高灵活性;近期无明显并发症和复发 [关键词] 经皮引导抽出钢丝;锤状指;伸直;屈伸功能 [中图分类号] R658.2 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)10-0080-04 Analysis on the application value of percutaneous guided extracting wire method in mallet finger ZHENG Buzhen JIANG Yanfei GU Shilin ZHENG Youmao LI Bowen Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Taizhou Enze Medical Center(Group) Enze Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Taizhou 318050, China [Abstract] Objective To analyze the application value of percutaneous guided extracting wire method in mallet finger. Methods A total of 28 patients with mallet finger who met the criteria of this study were included in the study. All of them were treated by percutaneous guided extracting wire method. Crawford score was used to objectively evaluate the mallet finger function before and after treatment; the Buck-Gramcko score was used to subjectively evaluate the curative effect after the treatment. The Crawford excellent and good rate before and after the treatment were compared, and the Crawford excellent and good rate in different staging and typing groups were compared. The Buck-Gramcko excellent and good rate was recorded after treatment; the number of complications and recurrence was recorded. Two typical cases were analyzed. Results The Crawford excellent and good rate was increased from 14.29% to 89.29% after treatment (P0.05); post-treatment subjective Buck-Gramcko score was(53.20±3.52), and the excellent and good rate was 92.86%; there were no complications and recurrence, the function was significantly improved in 2 typical cases of mallet finger after the treatment.

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档