17-奥伯曼-(同性恋问题)Gaymarriageisaquestionoflove.docVIP

17-奥伯曼-(同性恋问题)Gaymarriageisaquestionoflove.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
17-奥伯曼-(同性恋问题)Gaymarriageisaquestionoflove

Keith Olbermann Anchor, Countdown ? Profile Finally tonight as promised, a Special Comment on the passage, last week, of Proposition Eight in California, which rescinded the right of same-sex couples to marry, and tilted the balance on this issue, from coast to coast. Some parameters, as preface. This isnt about yelling, and this isnt about politics, and this isnt really just about Prop-8.? And I dont have a personal investment in this: Im not gay, I had to strain to think of one member of even my very extended family who is, I have no personal stories of close friends or colleagues fighting the prejudice that still pervades their lives. And yet to me this vote is horrible. Horrible. Because this isnt about yelling, and this isnt about politics. This is about the human heart, and if that sounds corny, so be it. If you voted for this Proposition or support those who did or the sentiment they expressed, I have some questions, because, truly, I do not understand. Why does this matter to you? What is it to you? In a time of impermanence and fly-by-night relationships, these people over here want the same chance at permanence and happiness that is your option. They dont want to deny you yours. They dont want to take anything away from you. They want what you want—a chance to be a little less alone in the world. Only now you are saying to them—no. You cant have it on these terms. Maybe something similar. If they behave. If they dont cause too much trouble.? Youll even give them all the same legal rights—even as youre taking away the legal right, which they already had. A world around them, still anchored in love and marriage, and you are saying, no, you cant marry. What if somebody passed a law that said you couldnt marry? I keep hearing this term re-defining marriage. If this country hadnt re-defined marriage, black people still couldnt marry white people. Sixteen states had laws on the books which made that illegal in 1967. 1967. The parents of the President-Elect

文档评论(0)

shenlan118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档