中国太极拳从缠丝劲问题谈起---顾留馨（Chinese Taijiquan from the problem of winding silk -- Gu Liuxin）.doc

中国太极拳从缠丝劲问题谈起---顾留馨（Chinese Taijiquan from the problem of winding silk -- Gu Liuxin） China Taijiquan from wrapping strength question - Gu Liuxin Chinese Taijiquan from wrapping strength question --- Gu Liuxin Gu Liuxin / Yuan Zhuang / Wu Chongqi finishing up work The June 1, 1964 sports newspaper that Mr. Xu Zhiyi on Taiji wrapping strength, caused a debate. The academic research atmosphere of National Wushu has been lagging behind other departments, and this contention is a good beginning. The focus of the debate is the similarities and differences between the wrapping strength and spinning strength. View of the differences on the issue, basically divided into two categories: the first category that wrapping strength for the unique Chen Style Taijiquan, wrapping strength and spinning strength is different. Second types of claim wrapping strength is all kinds of Taijiquan in common, wrapping strength is spinning strength. The first class advocates in addition to the basic point of view (wrapping strength unique to Chen) consistent, on the similarities and differences between the wrapping strength and drawing strength, have very different views. In addition to Chen, there is no other kinds of spinning strength? Is the talk ambiguously Mr. Xu Zhiyis article. That is the overall strength Taiji Jin, wrapping strength just spinning performance of Jin, this is the view of Mr Zhao Renqing. The strength of Taijiquan in spinning strength, strength of spiral wrapping strength, there is a difference between, spinning strength not to winning each others strength, spiral energy and wrapping strength is to win each other, this is the view of Mr Li Jingwu. They are the same in different, contradictory, self contradiction, and concept, contradiction, logic, Acer, Hong Junsheng, dragon Fengwu three gentlemen had made a critical analysis of a part of the. For the sake of space relation, this article is emphatically discussing with Mr. xu. We are the second category of advocates. My p