再论网络中设链行为的法律定性——兼与崔国斌先生商榷.pdfVIP

再论网络中设链行为的法律定性 一一兼与崔国斌先生商榷 内容提要:根据实质呈现标准，有学者将交互式传播行为区分为作品提供和作品展 示行为，设链行为可能侵犯版权人的作品展示权。这一观点未能明确作品提供权 (信息网 络传播权)与作品展示权之间的关系，因此存在问题:如果两者属于同一权利，在用户看来无论 是设链网站还是被链网站都实施了交互式传播行为，设链网站与被链网站不存在差异，此时的实质 呈现标准无异于用户感知标准;如果两者不属于同一权利，那么交互式传播行为既受作品提 供权拉制又受作品展示权拉制，显然不符合逻辑。根据公开传播权理论，设链网站提供的是作 品的网络地址，而非作品本身，所以设链行为并非网络传播行为。将破坏技术措施的设链行为认定为 不正当竞争行为，不会影响版权人获得行政、民事救济。 关键词:设链行为公开传播不正当竞争行为 Abstract: According to the 、ubstantial display standard, interactive comrnunication process is divided into two s叩缸ate actions: making available (works) and display to 也e public (works)，出 argued by some scholars; whereby anyone who , other than the copyright holder, supplies a hyperlink to the work on his website in企inges 也e public display right. However，也is 缸-gument fails to clari命 the relationship between the conc叩t of making available and the concept of display to 也e public , so there are problems with 出is viewpoint. If 也e two separate actions are of one single right, bo曲曲e hyperlink-setting websites and the hyper-linked websites would pe由rm interactive comrnunication behavior, and there is no difference between the two websites in the eyes ofusers; in such a c部e，也e substantial display standard is equal to users perception standard; Ifthe two actions are of different rights, an illogical result will 忱的w upon , as the one single interactive comrnunication behavior would be ∞ntrolled by both public display right and making available right, while both rights are exclusive rights. According to 也e 也eory of right of public comrnunication, what is provided by the hyperlink- se回ng websites is 也e IP address rather 也an the work itself，也erefore the hyperlink-se回ng behavior is not the behavior of comrnunicate throu白白e internet. To hold the TPMs circurnventing hyperlink-setting behavior as unfair compet让ion will not interfere with the copyright owners interests in obtaining adrninistrative and civil remedies. Key Words: hyperlink-s