- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
活化血浆凝固时间对血小板输注疗效评价探究
活化血浆凝固时间对血小板输注疗效评价探究
【摘要】 本研究探讨活化血浆凝固时间(APCT)对评价血小板输注疗效的价值,用血小板聚集凝血因子分析仪检测了20例血液病患者血小板输注前后APCT的变化,并与血小板计数增加校正指数(CCI)和实际血小板回收率(PPR)进行了对比研究。结果表明: 输注1小时、24小时后的APCT均明显缩短,APCT由血小板输注前的(103.7±11.3)秒分别缩短为输注后1小时、24小时的(60.0±9.7)秒、(68.5±9.8)秒,(Plt;0.01),而正常对照的APCT为(42.0±3.4)秒;按照CCI和PPR的判断标准(输注后1小时和24小时CCI分别为lt;7500和lt;5000, PPR分别为lt;30%和20%为输注无效),有2例为血小板输注无效,其输注1小时、24小时的CCI值分别为7415、2966和6913、4988,PPR值分别为28.0%、11.2% 和25.2%、14.1%。1例PPR均达血小板输注无效标准,而CCI值均显示血小板输注有效;2例PPR均达血小板输注无效标准,而输注1小时的CCI值表示为血小板输注有效,24小时的CCI值表示为血小板输注无效。结论: APCT可以反映血小板数量和质量的变化,也能较全面的评估血小板的输注疗效。
【关键词】 活化血浆凝固时间 血小板输注 血小板
Test of Activated Plasma Clotting Time to Assess Efficacy of Platelet Transfusion
Abstract The study was aimed to investigate the value of activated plasma clotting time (APCT) for estimating the efficacy of platelet transfusion therapy. There were twenty patients with hematological diseases, who received transfusion of platelet, involved in the test. APCT was determined before and after transfusion of these patients, then APCT was contrasted with corresponding CCI and PPR. The results showed that 1 hour and 24 hour APCTs were shortened obviously. APCT before transfusion was (103.7±11.3)seconds, but the 1 hour and 24 hour APCTs were shortened to (60.0±9.7) seconds and (68.5±9.8) seconds respectively (Plt;0.01). According to the judging criteria of CCI and PPR (CCI and PPR values at 1 and 24 hours after transfusion are lt;7500, lt;5000 and lt;30%,lt;20% respectively, the transfusion is invalid), two patients received invalid transfusion. Their 1 and 24 hour CCIs were 7415,2966 and 6913,4988 respectively. Their 1 and 24 hour PPRs were 28.0%,11.2% and 25.2%,14.1% respectively. One patient’s PPR reached the standard of invalid transfusion, but his CCI showed a valid transfusion he received. Two patients’ PPR reached the standard of invalid transfusion, but their 1 hour CCI reached the standard of valid transfusion, and their 24 hour CCI reached the standard of invalid transfusion. It is concluded
文档评论(0)