体育法基本原则-以体育特殊性为标准.docVIP

体育法基本原则:以体育特殊性为标准摘要：体育法的基本原则要解决体育法存在的正当性和自立性问题。它不仅可以指导体育法律规则，也可以在法律适用冲突中发挥作用。不仅可以成为体育法的条文，也应当可以解释体育法的规则。研究认为体育法的基本原则应当是具备专业性的、较高层级的，覆盖面宽，指导性强，稳定性好和可适用的基本原则。若要满足这些要求，那么这些原则同时也应当会是公认的，并具有一定传统和内涵的。本研究从体育实践和体育发展的角度以体育特殊性为标准确立体育法的基本原则。因此，在经过论证和取舍后，本研究尝试提出超越我国《体育法》文本的体育法的基本原则，即奥林匹克主义原则，公平竞赛原则，和谐体育原则。 关键词：体育法；基本原则；体育特殊性；奥林匹克主义；公平竞赛 中图分类号：G80-05文献标识码：A文章编号：1004-4590(2011)01-0005-07 Abstract:The fundamental principle of sports law should surport the legitimacy and independence of sports law. It not only guided the legal rules, but also applied to the resolution of legal confliction. It can not only be the provisions of the sports law, also be able to interprete the legal rules.Now, we are preparing to revise our Sports Law, it is the just time to research such issus, and it?s necessary. By logical analysis and case study, the author find some conclusions about sports law?s basic principles. It suggests that the basic principles of sports law should be professional, high level, wide coverage, well guidance, and good stability, and also to be applicable. To meet these requirements, then these principles must be extensive recognized , and have certain traditions and connotations. In this study, establish and explain the fundmental principles of sports law which is based on the practice and development of sports. Therefore, this article put beyond our “Sports Law” legislation text but take“the specificity of sport” as the criterion which confirm the basic principles of sports law. The paper points out the fundamental principles of sports law including olympism, fair play, and harmonious sports. Key words: sports law; principles; sports specificity; olympism; fair play 新自然法学派常常将法律归结为规则、政策和原则三要素。论及之间的区别时，德沃金认为规则与原则的差别在于一个规则对于一个预定的事件作出一个固定的反应；而一个原则则在我们决定如何对一个特定的实践作出反应时，指导我们对特定因素的思考。［1］也就是说规则的完善与否好比我们的视力程度，而原则的良善程度却决定了我们视野的宽度和长度。至于我们的体育法领域，具体的体育法条文和规则体现的是体育的制度安排和利益分配，是体育在法律上的存在方式和表现形式，它只能表述体育存在形式的问题，而不能回答体育为什么存在，体育法为什么存在的问题。类似这种法律存在正当性的质疑，往往会依托宪法展开论证。［2］但是，我们认为宪法解决的仅仅