- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
晚期大肠癌靶向治疗新进展课件
晚期大肠癌靶向治疗新进展 MACRO:贝伐珠单抗维持治疗一线治疗晚期 大肠癌 2. COIN:西妥昔单抗联合奥沙利铂为基础的化疗 治疗晚期大肠癌 疗 效 分 析 结 论 谢 谢! Importantly, both regimens were well tolerated, with 53% of XELIRI-treated patients experiencing at least one grade 3/4 event, compared with 48% of FOLFIRI-treated patients. Neutropenia was more common in the FOLFIRI + Avastin arm (23%) than in the XELIRI arm (15%). Rates of grade 3 diarrhoea were low in both arms, but higher with XELIRI (11%) than with FOLFIRI (5%). Grade 4 diarrhoea was seen in only 1% of patients in the XELIRI arm. * * Thank you to the ASCO programme committee for the opportunity to present the results of the MRC COIN trial of first line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients I am presenting on behalf of me colleagues across the UK and the republic of Ireland and the 2445 patients and families who participated in this trial, the largest ever conducted in this disease setting. * The primary endpoint of the cetuximab question is overall survival The emergence of randomised data indicating that the benefit of EGFR targeted monoclonal antibodies is limited to those with kras wildtype tumours, occurred just after the last patient had entered the study and prior to any analysis. The primary endpoint was then adjusted to improved overall survival in the Kras wildtype population. Secondary endpoints are as shown * Response rate was improved in the kras wt population with the addition of cetuximab from 57% to 64%; whereas in the kras mutation group, no improvement was sen nwith lower response rates overall 46% in Arm A and 43% in arm B. Note all responses were investigator assessed and no confirmatory scans were performed. * In light of the other positive trials in this setting we undertook a number of prespecified subgroup analyses to try to understand why the overall results were negative even in the wildtype patients. To maximise the sensitivity of these analyses we used the all wild-type group with PFS as the endpoint. Two subgroups showed s
文档评论(0)