Discriminant Function Analysis California State University 别函数分析加利福尼亚州立大学.pptVIP

下载本文档

6
0
约8.14千字
约 39页
2018-06-19 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Discriminant Function Analysis California State University 别函数分析加利福尼亚州立大学.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Discriminant Function Analysis California State University 别函数分析加利福尼亚州立大学

Discriminant Function Analysis Basics Psy524 Andrew Ainsworth Basics Used to predict group membership from a set of continuous predictors Think of it as MANOVA in reverse – in MANOVA we asked if groups are significantly different on a set of linearly combined DVs. If this is true, than those same “DVs” can be used to predict group membership. Basics How can continuous variables be linearly combined to best classify a subject into a group? Basics MANOVA and disriminant function analysis are mathematically identical but are different in terms of emphasis discrim is usually concerned with actually putting people into groups (classification) and testing how well (or how poorly) subjects are classified Essentially, discrim is interested in exactly how the groups are differentiated not just that they are significantly different (as in MANOVA) Basics Predictors can be given higher priority in a hierarchical analysis giving essentially what would be a discriminate function analysis with covariates (a discrim version of MANCOVA) Questions the primary goal is to find a dimension(s) that groups differ on and create classification functions Can group membership be accurately predicted by a set of predictors? Essentially the same question as MANOVA Questions Along how many dimensions do groups differ reliably? creates discriminate functions (like canonical correlations) and each is assessed for significance. Usually the first one or two discriminate functions are worth while and the rest are garbage. Each discrim function is orthogonal to the previous and the number of dimensions (discriminant functions) is equal to either the g - 1 or p, which ever is smaller. Questions Are the discriminate functions interpretable or meaningful? Does a discrim function differentiate between groups in some meaningful way or is it just jibberish? How do the discrim functions correlate with each predictor? Questions Can we classify new (unclassified) subjects into groups? Given the clas