- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肌电生物反馈治疗在脑梗死偏瘫患者中疗效观察
肌电生物反馈治疗在脑梗死偏瘫患者中疗效观察
[摘要] 目的 研究肌电生物反馈治疗在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的临床疗效。 方法 选取我院2011年11月~2012年10月的106例急性脑梗死偏瘫患者,平均(63.15±10.63)岁。其中男66例,平均(60.64±11.41)岁;女40例,平均(67.24±10.63)岁。所有患者的心脑血管疾病病程1~15年,采用疗效对比实验的方法,按照1∶1的人数比例将患者分为实验组和对照组,实验组病患在给予药物治疗的基础上增加肌电生物反馈治疗,对照组患者仅给予常规药物治疗,实验结束后比较两种疗法的临床效果。 结果 治疗前两组肌电值比较无明显差异(P 0.05);治疗后两组肌电值比较具有明显的差异(P 0.05);治疗后两组NIHSS评分比较具有显著的差异(P 0.05);治疗后两组ADL评分比较具有显著的差异(P
[关键词] 肌电生物反馈治疗;脑梗死偏瘫;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R743.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2013)25-0135-03
Effect of treatment by EMG biofeedback in patients with cerebral infarction
WANG Ling1 ZHANG Yunling2
1.Department of Neurology, Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Jinhua 321000, China; 2.Department of Encephalopathy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Oriental Hospital, Beijing 100078, China
[Abstract] Objective To study the EMG biofeedback therapy in stroke patients with hemiplegic in clinical efficacy. Methods Our hospital from November 2011 to October 2012, 106 patients with acute cerebral hemiplegic patient, patients age distribution range of 48 to 79 years, mean age (63.15±10.63) years of age. Including 66 males, mean age (60.64±11.41) years; 40 females, mean age (67.24±10.63) years of age. All patients with cardiovascular disease during the course of the disease ranged from 1 to 15 years, using the comparative efficacy of experimental methods, in accordance with the proportion of 1:1 were divided into experimental group and control group, the experimental group had given medical treatment based on added to give EMG biofeedback treatment, the control group of patients treated with conventional therapy only, after the end of experiment compared the clinical effects of differences in both treatments. Results Before treatment, EMG showed no significant difference(P 0.05), statistically insignificant; Emg compare two groups after treatment with significant differences(P 0.05), statistically insignificant; after treatment NIHSS score compared with significant differences(
文档评论(0)