- 2
- 0
- 约3.78万字
- 约 44页
- 2018-07-20 发布于江苏
- 举报
冠脉内直接支架术与常规支架术对冠心病不稳定性心绞痛患者vwf、et和vegf影响的对比研究
英 文 摘 要
consideredstatisticallysignificant.
Result:(1)Therewasnosignificantdifferenceofclinical
andinterventionalfeaturesbetweendirectstentinggroupand
conventionalstentinggroup.(2)Beforestenting,thedifferences
ofthelevelsofvWF,ET,VEGFwerenotsignificantbetween
thetwogroups(p0.05);ThelevelsofvWF.ETandVEGF
afterprocedureweresignificantlyhigherthanthosebefore
procedure;post-proceduralpeaklevelsofvWF、ETandVEGF
wereat4hours,12hoursand7daysrespectivelyinthetwo
groups,furthermore,post-proceduralpeaklevelsofvWF,ET
andVEGFinconventionalstentinggroupwerehigherthan
thoseindirectstentinggroup(p0.05).(3)Restenosisoccurred
in 19.8%(19/96)ofpatients,ofwhich 73.7(14/19)with
recurrenceofischemia.19patientsoccurredrestenosis.The
incidenceofrestenosisinconventionalstentinggroupwas
higherthanthoseindirectstentinggroup(p0.05).(4)The
post-proceduralpeaklevelsofvWF(relativeriskRR=3.841,
confidenceinternalCI=2.086-5.230,P=0.008)、ET(RR=2.457,
CI=1.633-4.206,p=0.013),VEGF(RR=2.531,CI=1.682-4.035,
P=0.010).PTCA+stent(RR=1.578,CI=1.235-2.116.P=0.035)
andstentlength(RR=1.276,CI=1.083一1.986,P=0.028)werethe
independentpredictorsofrestenosis.(5)Therewerepositive
correlationsbetweenpeaklevelsofvWFandET(r=0.7361,P
=0.0001),andalsobetweenpeaklevelsofETandVEGF
(r=0.6811,P=0.0001).
Conclusions:Directstentimplantionproducelighter
英 文 摘 要
vesselwallinjury,andlesseffectsonvWF,ETandVEGFand
lowerincidenceofrestenosis,inthefitfulrangeofcoronary
lession stenting
,thedirectstentingisbetterthanconventional
Keywords:percutaneouscoronaryintervention(PCI);
stenting;vWF;ET;VEGF;restenosis
研 究 论 文
冠脉内直接支架术与常规支架术对冠心病不
稳定性心绞痛患者AF,ET和VEGF影响的对比研究
前 言
冠状动脉内支架治疗已成为冠心病介入治疗领域的一
种主要技术,支架置入术己于 1987年开始运用于临床。通
过支架支撑、扩张管腔,防止血管弹性回缩和痉挛,封闭撕
裂的内膜和夹层,防止血管重构,有效
原创力文档

文档评论(0)