- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PICCO监测在肺心病并心力衰竭治疗中应用
PICCO监测在肺心病并心力衰竭治疗中应用
[摘要] 目的 探讨通过脉搏指数连续心输出量(PICCO)监测在肺心病并心力衰竭治疗中的应用效果。 方法 分析苏州大学附属第二医院2013年6月~2014年12月收治的肺心病并心力衰竭患者60例的临床资料,依据患者心功能监测方式不同进行分组,对照组30例和观察组30例。对照组给予常规监测,观察组给予PICCO监测。比较观察组治疗前后全心舒张末期容积(GEDVI)、心脏指数(CI)、外周血管阻力(SVRI);比较两组呼吸频率、心率、血气分析结果、肺功能情况及临床疗效情况。 结果 观察组治疗后GEDVI、CI、SVRI均优于治疗前(t=8.88、4.82、29.63,P 0.05);观察组治疗后呼吸频率、心率、血气分析、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、FEV1%均优于常规治疗组(t=11.99、3.87、4.46、5.59、8.96、10.64、10.73,P 0.05);观察组患者临床治疗总有效率优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.22,P 0.05)。 结论 PICCO监测在肺心病并心力衰竭治疗中应用后,可以改善患者临床症状和预后水平,值得临床推广应用。
[关键词] PICCO监测;肺心病并心力衰竭;血气分析;肺功能
[中图分类号] R541.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2015)06(b)-0092-04
The application of treatment pulmonary heart disease combined with heart failure by PICCO monitoring
ZHU Yanyan LU Juan
ICU Room, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou 215004, China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the application of treatment pulmonary heart disease combined with heart failure by PICCO monitoring. Methods Clinical data of 60 cases with pulmonary heart disease combined with heart failure in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from June 2013 to December 2014 were selected. According to different cardiac monitoring methods, patients were divided into the control group and the observation group, each group had 30 cases. Patients in the control group were given routine monitoring, while patients in the observation group were given PICCO monitoring. The GEDVI, CI, SVRI before and after treatment in the observation group were observed. The respiratory rate, heart rate, blood gas analysis results, lung function and clinical effect between the two groups were compared. Results After treatment GEDVI, CI, SVRI were better than before treatment in the observation group (t=8.88, 4.82, 29.63, P 0.05). After treatment, in the observation group, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood gas analysis, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV1% were better than those of control group, the differences were statistically si
文档评论(0)