- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
一体化护理模式对阿尔茨海默病患者生活质量及日常生活能力影响
一体化护理模式对阿尔茨海默病患者生活质量及日常生活能力的影响
[摘要] 目的 研究及观察一体化护理模式对阿尔茨海默病患者生活质量及日常生活能力的影响程度。 方法 选取2013年10月~2015年8月于中国医科大学附属盛京医院进行诊治的72例阿尔茨海默病患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各36例,对照组进行常规的阿尔茨海默病护理,观察组则采用一体化护理模式进行干预,然后将两组患者护理前和护理后1、3、6个月的阿尔茨海默病生命质量测评量表(QOL-AD量表)、日常生活能力量表(ADL量表)、症状自评量表(SCL-90量表)及简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE量表)评估结果进行比较。 结果 护理前两组患者的QOL-AD量表、ADL量表及MMSE量表评估结果比较差异无统计学意义(P 0.05),而护理后1、3、6个月观察组的QOL-AD量表、ADL量表及MMSE量表评估结果均显著好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05), 结论 一体化护理模式对阿尔茨海默病患者生活质量及日常生活能力的影响更为积极,其对于阿尔茨海默病患者的应用价值相对更高。
[关键词] 一体化护理模式;阿尔茨海默病;生活质量;日常生活能力
[中图分类号] R248.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)07(b)-0153-05
[Abstract] Objective To study and observe the influence degree of integration nursing for the life quality and activity of daily living of patients with Alzheimers disease. Methods 72 patients with Alzheimers disease in the Affiliated Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from October 2013 to August 2015 were selected as the research object, and they were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 36 cases in each group, the control group were taken care with conventional nursing of Alzheimers disease, the observation group were taken care with integration nursing, then the Alzheimers disease quality of life assessment scale (QOL-AD scale), activity of daily living scale(ADL scale), symptom checklist-90 scale (SCL-90 scale) and mini-mental state examination scale (MMSE scale) of two groups before the nursing and at first, third and sixth month after the nursing were respectively compared. Results The evaluation results of QOL-AD scale, ADL scale and MMSE scale of two groups before the nursing all had no obvious differences (all P 0.05), while the evaluation results of QOL-AD scale, ADL scale and MMSE scale of observation group at first, third and sixth month after the nursing were all significantly better than those of control group, there were all significant differences between the two groups′evaluation results (all P 0.05). Conclusion The influence of in
文档评论(0)