不同体位腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产孕妇血流动力学影响.docVIP

不同体位腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产孕妇血流动力学影响.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同体位腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产孕妇血流动力学影响

不同体位腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产孕妇血流动力学的影响   【摘要】 目的 观察不同体位腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)对剖宫产孕妇血流动力学的影响。方法 选择行剖宫产孕妇132例,随机分为坐位组和侧卧位组各66例,坐位组于坐位下注药,3 min后平卧;侧卧位组按传统方法注药。结果 坐位组一次性穿刺成功率98.5%明显高于侧卧位组84.9%(P0.01);坐位组最高麻醉平面在T6~T8,侧卧位组则在T3~T8;坐位组与侧卧位组麻醉平面达T8水平的时间分别为给药后6 min、3 min,稳定在最高麻醉平面的时间分别为7 min、12 min;坐位组需用麻黄素者7.8%,明显低于侧卧位组的22.7%(P0.01)。结论 两组均可获得满意的麻醉效果,但坐位组比侧卧位组会更具有优势,在临床上坐位CSEA麻醉具有广阔的应用前景。   【关键词】 腰硬联合麻醉;剖宫产;体位      Effect of different postures on hemodynamics during cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia      ZHAI Li-li,ZHUANG Zhao-ji,LIN Ya-li,et al.   The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Nanning,530023,China      【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effect of different postures on hemodynamics during cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA).Methods 132 patients underment cesarean section were selected and randomly divided into sitting position group(66 patients)and lateral decubitus position group(66 patients),the patients in sitting position group were given medicine in sitting position and took horizontal position after three minutes; The patients in lateral decubitus position group were given medicine routinely.Results The one-time success rate of puncture in sitting position group(98.5%) was higher than that of in lateral decubitus position group(84.9%)(P0.01);The level of anesthesia in sitting position group was T6~T8 ,it was T3~T8 in lateral decubitus position group;The time of anesthetic plane to the T8 were 6 minutes and 3 minutes respectively, stabilized time were 7 minutes and 12 minutes respectively in sitting position group and lateral decubitus position group; 7.8% patients in sitting group used ephedrine and 22.7% patients in lateral decubitus position group,the difference was significant(P0.01).Conclusion The patients of two groups all receive satisfied anesthetic effect,but sitting position group has more effective so combined spinal-epidual anesthesia with sitting postion have rast ap

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档