临床药师干预特殊人群不合理用药回顾性分析.docVIP

临床药师干预特殊人群不合理用药回顾性分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床药师干预特殊人群不合理用药回顾性分析

临床药师干预特殊人群不合理用药的回顾性分析   [摘要] 目的 促进临床特殊人群患者的合理用药。方法 回顾性分析2015年1~12月石家庄市第四医院临床药师对孕产妇、哺乳期妇女、老年患者及新生儿等特殊人群实施的药学干预,分析临床存在的不合理用药情况。结果 临床药师干预特殊人群住院医嘱共计216例次,其中医师采纳干预185例次,干预原因主要是用法用量不适宜(42.10%)、品种选择不合理(19.44%)、重复用药(19.00%)等,干预药物种类以抗生素为主(72.70%)。结论 医生应重视对药品说明书和用药指导原则的学习,临床药师为特殊人群临床合理用药提供有力的药学服务和帮助,共同努力降低用药的不良反应,保证用药安全有效。   [关键词] 用药干预;临床药师;回顾性分析;特殊人群;不合理用药;抗感染;抗肿瘤   [中图分类号] R952 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)03(b)-0132-04   Retrospective analysis of clinical pharmacist intervening irrational drug use on special groups   LIU Yang1 DU Jing2 LI Xiaolong3 ZHOU Miao1 WANG Yan1   1.Department of Pharmacy, the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; 2.Department of Pharmacy, the Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; 3.Department of Breast Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050011, China   [Abstract] Objective To promote the rational use of drugs in special groups. Methods The drug intervention in pregnant women, lactating women, senile patients and newborns in the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang from January to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, and the irrational drug use was analyzed. Results A total of 216 cases of special groups instructions were intervened by clinic pharmacists in 2015, among which physicians adopted 185 cases. The main reasons for intervention were mainly inappropriate dosage (42.10%), irrational selection (19.44%) and repeated use (19.00%). The main drug types were antibiotics(72.70%). Conclusion Doctors should pay attention to the study of drug instructions and guidelines, clinical pharmacists should provide powerful pharmaceutical care and help for clinical rational drug use of special groups, to reduce adverse drug reaction and make sure that the drug is safe and effective.   [Key words] Drug intervention; Clinical pharmacist; Retrospective analysis; Special groups; Irrational drug use; Anti-infection; Antineoplastic   石

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档