- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理对一次性宫腔组织吸引管人工流产术后患者不良情绪及疼痛程度影响分析
优质护理对一次性宫腔组织吸引管人工流产术后患者的不良情绪及疼痛程度影响分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨优质护理在一次性宫腔组织吸引管人工流产术中应用及其对患者不良情绪与疼痛程度的影响。 方法 收集我院2014年1月~2015年12月间实施一次性宫腔组织吸引管人工流产术的120例孕妇作为研究对象,将其按照随机数字表法分为常规护理组与优质护理组,各60例。常规护理组患者给予临床常规护理,而优质护理组患者给予优质护理,观察两组患者的临床护理效果及其不良情绪的变化。 结果 优质护理组手术疼痛程度中Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级分别为45.00%、41.67%、11.67%、1.67%,常规护理组手术疼痛程度中Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级分别为6.67%、46.67%、36.67%、10.00%,优质护理组患者手术疼痛程度明显低于常规护理组。护理后优质护理组患者SAS和SDS分别为(31.67±2.55)分、(30.52±3.11)分,常规护理组患者SAS和SDS分别为(46.14±2.63)分、(47.12±3.01)分,护理后优质护理组评分均低于常规护理组,而临床护理满意度评分(89.67±1.27)分高于常规护理组(72.45±5.23)分,且两组间数据比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 临床中对一次性宫腔组织吸引管人工流产术患者临床护理中实施优质护理是可行的,可以改善患者的不良情绪,减轻术后疼痛程度,值得临床护理应用。
[关?I词] 一次性宫腔组织吸引管;人工流产术;优质护理;不良情绪;疼痛程度
[中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)33-0161-04
[Abstract] Objective To explore the application of quality nursing after artificial abortion by disposable suction curettage tube and its effect on adverse emotions and pain degree. Methods 120 pregnant women who were given artificial abortion by disposable suction curettage tube from January 2014 to December 2015 were collected as the study subjects. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into routine nursing group and quality nursing group, with 60 cases in each group. Patients in the routine nursing group were given clinical routine care, and patients in the quality nursing group were given quality care. The clinical nursing effect and the changes of adverse emotions in the two groups of patients were observed. Results The surgical pain degrees of grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 45.00%, 41.67%, 11.67%, and 1.67% respectively in the quality nursing group, and the surgical pain degrees of grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 6.67%, 46.67%, 36.67%, and 10.00% respectively in the routine nursing group. The degrees of surgical pain in the patients in the quality nursing group were significantly lower than those in the routine nursing group. After nursing, the SAS and SDS were(31.67±2.55) points and(30.52±3.11) points respectively in the quality nur
原创力文档


文档评论(0)