关于假装语言分析和概念考察.docVIP

关于假装语言分析和概念考察 　　提 要:如何从事中国后语言哲学研究,这是一个需要回答的根本问题。围绕这一问题,我们以汉语假装为例来说明中国后语言哲学应该走“语言分析”和“概念考察”相结合的道路。基于这一认识,就假装而论,有两个问题值得思考:关于“假装摇头”是否可能的语言问题和关于“假装假装”是否可能的概念问题。我们发现:当“假装”作为语词使用时,它所构成的“v1+v2”双动词结构如“假装摇头”会在语言形式上出现逻辑张力,从而说明语言的可能与事实的可能二者的界限并不统一;而作为概念的假装所引发的概念问题,如“假装假装”是否可能这一问题,折射出的道理是语言使用和概念认知并不对等。由此可知,语言问题和概念问题往往交织在一起,影响着我们的生活,因此对一个个类似于假装问题的语言问题和概念问题的澄清是后语言哲学的中心任务。 　　关键词:假装; 语言分析; 概念考察; 中国后语言哲学 　　中图分类号:B089 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1000-0100(2010)02-0007-7 　　 　　A Linguistic Analysis and Conceptual Investigation of Jia zhuang 　　―Towards the Post Philosophy of Language in China 　　Du Shi hong 　　(Southwest University, Chongqing400715, China) 　　How can the post philosophy of language in China be done?This is a prime question awaiting answers. Committed to this question, we base our suggested answer upon a linguistic analysis and conceptual investigation of the Chinese verb jia zhuang (pretend), so as to make it clear that doing post philosophy of language in China must be kept on the dual track of making linguistic analysis and conducting conceptual investigations. In the case of jia zhuang, two questions have attracted our attention: What is the justification for jia zhuang yao tou (pretending to shake one’s head)? Is it possible for us to jia zhuang jia zhuang (pretend to pretend)? Centering upon the two questions, this paper attempts to provide an insight into the natural “v1+v2” construction of the Chinese verb jia zhuang into which a conceptual investigation has been made in terms of the relation of language to reality and cognition. It has been found that the natural usage of jia zhuang mirrors the unclear cut boundary line among language, reality and cognition. Thus a conclusion can be drawn that the clarification of such linguistic and conceptual problem as in the case of jia zhuang is a central task for philosophers of language to perform. 　　Key words:jia zhuang (pretend); linguistic analysis; conceptual investigation; the post philosophy of language in China 　　 　　1 引