全方位护理干预对心肌梗死患者舒适度影响分析.docVIP

全方位护理干预对心肌梗死患者舒适度影响分析 　　[摘要] 目的 分析心肌梗死患者行全方位护理干预对其舒适度的影响。 方法 方便选取该院2013年3月―2015年12月收治的心肌梗死90例患者资料进行回顾性分析，根据护理时所用方案分成两组，将行常规性护理干预38例患者设为对照组，将在对照组护理基础上行全方位护理干预52例患者设为观察组，对两组舒适度、心理状态进行对比。 结果 护理后，两组环境、生理、心理与社会文化评分均较护理前显著改善，且观察组改善效果比对照组优，并且观察组环境评分（86.60±8.68）、生理评分（82.30±8.14）、心理评分（75.90±10.20）与社会文化评分（85.80±12.41）均优于对照组，比较差异均具有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组SCL-90总评分（4.40±0.40）分比对照组（7.60±2.33）分优，比较差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 心肌梗死患者行全方位护理干预的效果显著，能够提高患者舒适度，并改善心理状态，可应用于临床。 　　[关键词] 心肌梗死；全方位护理干预；舒适度 　　[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）04（a）-0141-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on comfort in patients with myocardial infarction Methods 90 cases of patients with myocardial infarction admitted and treated in our hospital from March 2013 to December 2015 were selected and divided into two groups according to the nursing plans， the control group （38 cases） were given conventional nursing intervention， the observation group （52 cases） were given comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of the control group， and the comfort and mental state were compared between the two groups. Results After nursing， the environmental， physical， mental and social culture scores of both groups were obviously improved compared with those before nursing， and the improvement effect in the observation group was better than that in the control group， and the environmental score， physical score， mental score and social culture score in the observation group were respectively （86.60±8.68）， （82.30±8.14）， （75.90±10.20） and （85.80±12.41）， which were better than those in the control group， and the differences by comparison had statistical significance， P0.05， the total score of SCL-90 in the observation group was better than that in the control group， [（4.40±0.40） vs （7.60±2.33）]， and the differences by comparison had statistical significance， P0.05. Conclusion The effect of comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with myocardial infarction is obvious，