- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
加强健康教育指导对慢性盆腔炎患者生活质量影响
加强健康教育指导对慢性盆腔炎患者生活质量影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨加强健康教育指导对慢性盆腔炎患者生活质量的影响。 方法 选取2014年7月~2015年10月我院收治的100例慢性盆腔炎患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各50例,对照组实施常规护理措施,观察组则在常规护理基础上加强健康教育指导,对两组患者的疾病知识认知情况、并发症发生率及生存质量进行评价。 结果 干预前观察组和对照组患者的认知评分分别为(52.4±9.6)分和(53.1±9.5)分,干预后观察组和对照组的评分分别为(94.3±2.9)分和(67.2±11.5)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),干预后观察组患者的生理领域、心理领域、独立性领域、社会关系领域、环境领域方面的评分均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 加强健康教育指导能够有效提高患者的疾病认知程度,减少并发症的发生,改善患者的生活质量,值得在临床上推广和应用。
[关键词] 慢性盆腔炎;健康教育;疾病认知;生活质量
[中图分类号] R248.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)04(c)-0185-03
Influence of enhancing health education guidance on quality of life in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease
CHEN Cai-xiang1 HUANG Shui-ying2
1.Department of Health Prevention,Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Huidong County in Guangdong Province,Huizhou 516300,China;2.Department of Gynecology,Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Huidong County in Guangdong Province,Huizhou 516300,China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the influence of enhancing health education guidance on the quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID). Methods From July 2014 to October 2015,100 CPID patients admitted into our hospital were selected and evenly divided into observation group and control group by a random number table.In the control group,conventional nursing was provided,while in the observation group,on the basis of the conventional nursing,education health guidance was added.The disease knowledge cognition,incidence of complications,and QOL were evaluated and compared in the two groups. Results Before intervention,the score of patient′s cognition in the observation group and control group was (52.4±9.6) and (53.1±9.5),and after intervention,they were (94.3±2.9) and (67.2±11.5) respectively with statistical differences (P0.05).After intervention,scores of patient′s physiology,psychology,independence,social relations,and environment in the observation group were much higher in comparison with those in the
文档评论(0)