实时超声弹性成像靶向活检与超声造影靶向活检对老年前列腺癌诊断作用研究.docVIP

实时超声弹性成像靶向活检与超声造影靶向活检对老年前列腺癌诊断作用研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
实时超声弹性成像靶向活检与超声造影靶向活检对老年前列腺癌诊断作用研究

实时超声弹性成像靶向活检与超声造影靶向活检对老年前列腺癌诊断作用研究   [摘要] 目的 探讨超声弹性成像联合靶向活检与前列腺超声造影对老年前列腺癌的诊断效果。 方法 对收入我院的120例前列腺癌疑似患者进行诊断研究,收集患者资料,采用不同的检测方法进行诊断,比较各?N检查方法的诊断效果差异。 结果 常规超声诊断前列腺癌的敏感性为64.71%、准确性为68.33%、特异性为71.01%、阳性预测值为62.26%、阴性预测值为73.13%。病理恶性组的经直肠实时组织超声弹性成像技术(transrectal real-time tissue ultrasound elastography,TRTE)总评分显著高于病理良性组(P0.05)。对三种活检方式进行比较,TRTE+CEUS活检的检出率高于TRTE靶向活检,TRTE靶向活检检出率高于系统活检(P0.05)。 结论 实时超声弹性成像联合超声造影进行靶向活检效果优于系统活检以及单独应用超声弹性成像活检,能提高检出率。   [关键词] 经直肠超声造影;经直肠超声;经直肠实时弹性成像;老年前列腺癌   [中图分类号] R445.1;R737.25 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)01-0119-04   The study on transrectal real-time elastography targeted biopsy and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of senile prostate cancer   LU Bin ZHOU Yibo   Department of Ultrasound, Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Jinhua 321000, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of ultrasound elastography combined with targeted biopsy and prostatic ultrasonography on the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the elderly. Methods 120 patients with suspected prostate cancer admitted in our hospital were conducted diagnostic studies. The data of patients were collected,and the patients were diagnosed by different detection methods. The difference of the diagnostic effects of various inspection methods was compared. Results The sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of routine ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer was 64.71%, 68.33%, 71.01%, 62.26% and 73.13%, respctvively. The total score of transrectal real-time tissue thermollectography (TRTE) in the malignant group was significantly higher than that in the benign group(P0.05). Three biopsies were compared.The detection rate of TRTE+CEUS was higher than that in TRTE targeted biopsy, and the biopsy detection rate of TRTE targeted biopsy was higher than that of systemic biopsy(P   [Key words] Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography; Transrectal ultrasound; Transrectal rea

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档