- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小夹板外固定在小儿骨折治疗中临床疗效探讨
小夹板外固定在小儿骨折治疗中临床疗效探讨
[摘要] 目的 探讨小夹板外固定在小儿骨折患者中的临床疗效和优点。方法 方便选取该院68例骨折患儿为研究对象,所有人员均为2010年8月―2016年8月来该院诊疗人员。系统随机分为两组,各34例。干预组采用小夹板外固定治疗,常规组采用手术切开复位内固定治疗。调查患儿骨折愈合时间,评估患儿疗效。结果 干预组痊愈26例,常规组15例。两组评估有效率分别为97.1%、79.4%,比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.82,Plt;0.05)。干预组仅有1例骨折不愈合病例,并?l症发生率为2.9%,常规组为20.6%。比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.82,Plt;0.05)。两组患者骨折愈合时间分别为(67.2±10.5)、(79.6±8.1)d,比较差异有统计学意义(t=11.25,Plt;0.05)。结论 在小儿骨折治疗中小夹板外固定方法简便,效果理想,具有更高的应用价值。
[关键词] 小夹板外固定;小儿骨折;内固定
[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(c)-0104-03
The Clinical Effect of Small Splint External Fixation in the Treatment of Childrens Fracture
FANG Bing
Department of Rehabilitation, Fuzhou Children’s Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350000 China
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to investigate the clinical effect of external fixation of pedicle screw in pediatric fracture patients. Methods 68 cases of fractures in this hospital as the research object, all staff are from August 2010 to August 2016 convenient selected to this hospital clinics. The system was randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group was treated with small splint external fixation. The conventional group was operated by open reduction and internal fixation. Investigate the fracture healing time in children was to evaluate the efficacy of children. Results In intervention group 26 cases were cured, with 15 cases in conventional group. The effective rate of assessment in both groups was 97.1% and 79.4%, respecthe difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.82,Plt;0.05). There was only one case of fracture nonunion in the intervention group, with a complication rate of 2.9% and a routine group of 20.6%. the difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.82,Plt;0.05). The healing time of fractures in both groups were (67.2±10.5)d and (79.6±8.1)d respectively, the difference was statistically significant(t=11.25,Plt;0.05). Conclusion The method of external fixation with small splint is simple, the effect is satisfactory with higher a
文档评论(0)