- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
床旁端坐位护理对COPD患者机械通气时间影响研究
床旁端坐位护理对COPD患者机械通气时间影响研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨床旁端坐位护理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者机械通气时间的影响。 方法 选择2013年1月~2014年1月我院收治的96例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者作为研究对象,根据护理方式不同将其分为对照组与观察组,每组48例。对照组给予常规治疗和护理,观察组在对照组的基础上给予床旁端坐位护理,对比分析两组患者的机械通气时间、住院时间、护理前后血气指标变化情况等。 结果 两组患者护理前的PaO2、PaCO2、SpO2水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);护理后,观察组的PaO2、PaCO2、SpO2改善水平优于对照组(P0.05)。观察组机械通气时间、住院时间均低于对照组,呼吸机成功撤机率为85.4%,高于对照组的64.6%,呼吸机相关肺炎的发生率为4.2%,低于对照组的22.9%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 床旁端坐位护理可有效改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的通气功能,减少机械通气时间,降低呼吸机相关肺炎的发生情况,缩短住院时间,提高患者生存质量,其临床应用价值高。
[关键词] 慢性阻塞性肺疾病;床旁端坐位;机械通气;呼吸机相关性肺炎
[中图分类号] R473 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)35-0127-04
[Abstract] Objective To explore influences of bedside sitting nursing on mechanical ventilation duration of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD). Methods Ninety six patients with COPD admitted in the hospital from January 2013 to January 2014 were selected as research subjects, who were divided into control group and observation group with 48 patients in each group according to different nursing modes. The patients in the control group were subjected to conventional treatment and nursing, while the patients in the observation group were subjected to bedside sitting nursing on the basis of that applied in the control group, mechanical ventilation duration, length of hospital stay, changes in blood and vigor indexes before and after nursing of two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results The differences in comparisons of PaO2, PaCO2 and SpO2 levels of patients in two groups had no statistically significant before nursing (P0.05); and PaO2, PaCO2 and SpO2 levels of patients in the observation group after nursing were better than those indexes of patients in the control group (P0.05). Mechanical ventilation duration and length of hospital stay of patients in the observation group were lower than those of patients in the control group, the successful removal of respirators used in the observation hit was 85.4%, was higher than 64.6% in the control group, the incidence of
文档评论(0)