- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
急诊床边局麻下锥颅免冲洗单纯引流术与传统钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿疗效分析
急诊床边局麻下锥颅免冲洗单纯引流术与传统钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿疗效分析
[摘要] 目的 观察急诊床边局麻下锥颅免冲洗引流术对慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)的临床疗效。 方法 将高要市人民医院2007年1月~2012年1月收治的CSDH患者113例,按手术方式不同分为观察组56例和对照组57例。观察组行急诊床边局麻下锥颅免冲洗单纯引流术,对照组行传统单孔引流冲洗术,比较两组疗效及术后并发症的发生情况。 结果 观察组患者的治愈率及总有效率分别为64.3%、98.2%,均明显高于对照组的42.1%及87.7%,差异均有统计学意义(χ2 = 9.715、7.680,P 0.05或P 0.01);对照组出现张力性气颅、硬膜下积液及颅内积气各2例,颅内出血1例,而观察组患者术后仅出现硬膜下积液和颅内积气各1例,两组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学差异(χ2 = 4.348,P 0.05)。 结论 急诊床边局麻下锥颅免冲洗引流术对CSDH的疗效确切,并发症少,值得临床推广。
[关键词] 局麻下锥颅免冲洗引流术;慢性硬膜下血肿;临床疗效
[中图分类号] R651.12 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2013)11(c)-0057-03
Efficacy analysis of emergency bedside skull rinse under local anesthesia drainage and traditional drilling drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma
FENG Weijian XIA Junbiao CHEN Hanming CHEN Xinghuo MAI Jianpei YE Jianjun
Department of Neurosurgery, Peoples Hospital of Gaoyao City, Guangdong Province, Gaoyao 526100, China
[Abstract] Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of emergency bedside skull rinse under local anesthesia drainage and traditional drilling drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Methods 113 cases of CSDH patients from January 2007 to January 2012 in Peoples Hospital of Gaoyao City were selected and divided into observation group with 56 cases and control group with 57 cases according to the surgical methods. Observation group was treated with emergency bedside skull rinse under local anesthesia alone drainage, control group was treated with conventional drilling drainage. The efficacy and the occurrence of postoperative complications were compared. Results The cure rate and the total effective rate of observation group were 64.3%, 98.2% respectively, which were higher than those of control group (42.1%, 87.7%), the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 9.715, 7.680, P 0.05 or P 0.01). 2 cases of tension pneumothorax, 2 cases of intracranial subdural effusion and 2 cases of gas accumulation, 1 case of intracranial hemorrhage in control group were fo
文档评论(0)