教师标准化患者结合病例导引教学模式在短暂性脑缺血发作教学中应用.docVIP

教师标准化患者结合病例导引教学模式在短暂性脑缺血发作教学中应用.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
教师标准化患者结合病例导引教学模式在短暂性脑缺血发作教学中应用

教师标准化患者结合病例导引教学模式在短暂性脑缺血发作教学中应用   [摘要] 目的 探索教师标准化患者(TSP)+病例导引教学(CBL)模式解决短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)课临床教学“老大难”问题的可行性。 方法 分别对八年制临床医学系2012级(38人)和2011级(38人)的TIA课采用TSP+CBL教学法和单纯TSP教学法。学习结束时,比较分析两组教学课堂考核成绩和教学效果调查问卷自评分。用t检验评价2种方法的教学效果。 结果 TSP+CBL组学生课堂考核平均分达(88.76±3.48)分,显著高于TSP 组的(85.27±3.01)分(P 0.05)。TSP+CBL组尤在临床思维、与人合作和解决问题能力方面成绩明显高于TSP组(P 0.01)。TSP+CBL组对教学效果调查问卷的平均自评分为(92.29±1.56)分,显著高于TSP组的(85.27±3.01)分(P 0.01)。TSP+CBL组在“对教材内容理解掌握程度”、“对新教学法满意程度”、“有利理论与临床实践结合”3个方面显著高于TSP组(均P 0.01)。 结论 以TSP+CBL的教学模式值得推广,对此类发作-间歇型疾病的临床教学具有普遍性意义。   [关键词] 教师标准化患者;病例导引教学;短暂性脑缺血发作   [中图分类号] R193 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)03(a)-0165-04   Application of teacher as standardized patient combined with case-based learning mode in transient ischemic attack teaching   FU Yu FAN Dongsheng▲ LU Ming SONG Hongsong   Department of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China   [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the feasibility of teacher as standardized patient (TSP) combined with case based learning (CBL) teaching mode to solve clinical teaching persistent problem of the transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods TSP combined with CBL was used in 38 eight-year medical students of grade 2012, while TSP was used in 38 eight-year medical students of grade 2011. At the end of the study, teaching effect was assessed by the final examination and questionnaires. The data were processed by t test. Results The average test score in the TSP combined with CBL group was (88.76±3.48) scores, which was significantly higher than that in the TSP group (85.27±3.01) scores (P 0.05). Scores of clinical thinking, cooperating with others and solving problems in TSP combined with CBL group were significantly higher than those in TSP group (P 0.01). The score of the questionnaire in the TSP combined with CBL group was (92.29±1.56) scores, which was significantly higher than (85.27±3.01) scores in TSP group (P 0.01). Scores of “understanding of teaching materials”, “satisfaction with new teaching method

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档