- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
显影剂加温处理在CT增强扫描检查中应用效果
显影剂加温处理在CT增强扫描检查中应用效果
[摘要] 目的 探讨显影剂加温处理应用于CT增强扫描检查的效果以及对不良事件发生率的影响。 方法 选取1300例接受CT增强检查的患者,将其随机分为加温组和常温组,每组650例,加温组于CT增强检查之前将显影剂加温到37℃之后再进行静脉注射(浓度:CT血管造影370 mg I/ml,动态增强300 mg I/ml),常温组的显影剂在20℃下直接进行静脉注射(浓度:CT血管造影370 mg I/ml,动态增强300 mg I/ml),比较两组患者不同温度下各浓度显影剂注射后的血管压力以及注射显影剂后变态反应和外渗的发生率。 结果 相同的温度下,注射显影剂的浓度越高,速度越快,其对血管造成的压力也就越大,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),在应用370 mg I/ml浓度的显影剂时,加温组患者在变态反应的发生率以及药物外渗率均明显低于常温组,组间比较差异有有统计学意义(0.81%比2.29%,1.62%比3.82%,P0.05)。 结论 加温处理对于低渗显影剂的变态反应发生率以及外渗率几乎无影响,而对于高渗显影剂,加温后可以显著降低变态反应发生率以及外渗率。
[关键词] 显影剂;加温;变态反应;外渗
[中图分类号] R981.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)06(c)-0062-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the influence of effect and incidences of adverse reactions on contract agent by heating on computed tomography (CT) enhancement scan. Methods One thousand and three hundred patients accepted CT enhancement scan were evenly divided into heating group and room temperature group in random.In the heating group,contrast agent was warmed up to 37℃ and injected intravenously before CT enhancement scan (concentration: CT angiography was 370 mg I/ml, dynamic enhancement was 300 mg I/ml),while in the room temperature group,contrast agent was injected intravenously under room temperature of 20℃ (concentration: CT angiography was 370 mg I/ml, dynamic enhancement was 300 mg I/ml). The vascular pressure after injection contrast agent by different concentration,incidence of allergic reaction and exosmosis rate in the two groups were compared. Results Under the same temperature,the higher concentration of injected contrast agent and faster the speed was,the greater vascular pressure was,which displayed a statistical difference (P0.05).When 370 mg I/ml contrast agent was applied,incidence of allergic reaction and exosmosis rate in the heating group were both less than those in the room temperature group,which displayed statistical differences after inter-group comparison (0.81% vs 2.29% and 1.62% vs 3.82%,P [Key words] Contrast agent; Heating; Allergic reacti
文档评论(0)