无针缝合器在妇产科开腹手术切口闭合中应用.docVIP

无针缝合器在妇产科开腹手术切口闭合中应用.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
无针缝合器在妇产科开腹手术切口闭合中应用

无针缝合器在妇产科开腹手术切口闭合中应用   [摘要]目的 回顾性总结我院妇产科近3年多来在妇产科开腹手术切口闭合中使用无针缝合器的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析我院300例开腹妇科手术患者,采用随机数字法平均分为实验组与对照组,分别给予无针缝合器及传统针线缝合手术切口皮肤,比较两组患者临床差异及患者满意度。 结果 无针缝合器与传统针线缝合方式相比较,无皮肤创伤、无蜈蚣足样瘢痕、无异物、无炎症反应、无压迫、血供良好、排出通畅、自助拆除无拆线疼痛。无针缝合器缝合切口皮肤时间(2.74±0.54)s,住院天数(5.32±0.54)d,伤口瘢痕宽度(0.22±0.55)cm明显低于传统针线缝合缝合切口皮肤时间(5.85±1.45)s,住院天数(6.43±1.98)d,伤口瘢痕宽度(5.14±2.54)cm,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无针缝合器满意度评分(7.89±1.68)分明显高于传统针线缝合满意度评分(6.45±1.67)分,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 妇产科开腹手术行无针缝合器闭合切口有较好的临床疗效,切口对合整齐,切口一期愈合率高,愈合完整美观,患者及家属有较高的满意度,值得临床推广应用。   [关键词]无针缝合器;妇科开腹手术;皮肤切口   [中图分类号] R719.8#8195;#8195;#8195;[文献标识码] A#8195;#8195;#8195;[文章编号] 2095-0616(2014)11-208-03      Application of needle-free suture for incision suture in gynecological and obstetrical laparotomy   WANG#8195;Liying1#8195;#8195;ZU#8195;Liqiu2   1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peoples Hospital of Funing County, Funing 066300, China; 2.Department of General Surgery, Peoples Hospital of Funing County, Funing 066300, China   [Abstract] Objective To retrospectively summarize the clinical efficacy of needle-free suture for incision suture in gynecological and obstetrical laparotomy in the department of gynecology and obstetrics in our hospital for the recent three years. Methods 300 patients who received gynecological laparotomy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and randomly allocated to an experimental group and a control group according to a random number table. The two groups received needle-free suture and conventional needle suture for surgical skin incisions respectively, and clinical differences and patients’ satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the conventional needle suture, the needle-free suture had no skin damages, no centipede-shaped scars, no inflammatory reactions, no pressure, good blood supply, unobstructed discharge and no pain when removing the stitches. Time of suturing skin incision via needle-free suture was (2.74±0.54) seconds, hospitalization was (5

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档