- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
琥珀酸亚铁治疗妊娠合并缺铁性贫血疗效与安全性分析
琥珀酸亚铁治疗妊娠合并缺铁性贫血疗效与安全性分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨琥珀酸亚铁治疗妊娠合并缺铁性贫血的临床疗效,并分析其安全性。方法 整群选取该院2016年1―12月期间所收治的86例妊娠合并缺铁性贫血妇女作为该次研究对象,对其进行随机分组,研究组和对照组各43例,所有妇女均停用有关补充铁元素的药物,并对红细胞、血红蛋白和血清铁蛋白等血液指标进行检测,对照组妇女应用硫酸亚铁治疗,研究组采取琥珀酸亚铁治疗,对比分析两组患者的临床疗效与治疗前后的血液指标和不良反应发生情况。结果 两组治疗前的血液指标无统计学意义,不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组的临床总有效率为95.35%,显著高于对照组74.42%,治疗后,研究组RBC(3.85±0.89)×1012L、Hb(113.72±13.53)g/L、SF(53.68±21.47)μg/L明显优于对照组(3.45±0.65)×1012L、(105.48±10.18)g/L、(40.14±15.40)μg/L,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 琥珀酸亚铁治疗妊娠合并缺铁性贫血的的效果明显,能够有效改善妇女的临床症状,值得推广应用。
[关键词] 琥珀酸亚铁;妊娠合并缺铁性贫血;安全性
[中图分类号] R4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)11(a)-0111-03
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical curative effect and safety of ferrous succinate in treatment of pregnancy and hypoferric anemia and analyze its safety. Methods 86 cases of women with pregnancy and hypoferric anemia admitted and treated in our hospital from January to December 2016 were group selected and randomly divided into two groups with 43 cases in each, all women stopped using the related iron-element tonics, and the red cell, hemoglobin and serum ferroprotein were tested and the control group and the research group were respectively treated with ferrous sulfate and ferrous succinate, and the clinical curative effect and blood indexes and occurrence of adverse reactions before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The differences in the blood indexes between the two groups were not statistically significant, and there was no obvious difference in the occurrence of adverse reactions without statistical significance(P0.05), and the total clinical effective rate in the research group was obviously higher than that in the control group, (95.35% vs 74.42%), after treatment, the RBC, Hb and SF in the research group were obviously better than those in the control group, [(3.85±0.89)×1012L, (113.72±13.53)g/L, (53.68±21.47)μg/L vs (3.45±0.65)×1012L, (105.48±10.18)g/L,(40.14±15.40)μg/L], and the differences were obvious, with statistical s
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 参保单位派出证明.docx VIP
- 中国计量大学803传感器技术1--2011--2020年考研初试真题.pdf VIP
- 2025届安徽省“江南十校”高三联考英语试卷(含官方答案)原卷.pdf
- DB23_T(1621.10-1621.14)-2015:黑龙江省建设工程施工操作技术规程(三).pdf VIP
- 12YJ1工程用料做法.docx VIP
- Hasselblad哈苏相机X2D II 100C User Manual - 简体中文用户手册说明书(中文版).pdf
- 中考冲刺励志文案【90句】.pdf VIP
- 05175税收筹划自考课程.docx VIP
- J B∕T13573-2018低环境温度空气源热泵热风机.pdf VIP
- 新能源电动汽车充电桩运营与管理.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)