系统护理干预对鼻内镜下治疗鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者效果分析.docVIP

系统护理干预对鼻内镜下治疗鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者效果分析 　　【摘要】 目的 探析系统护理干预对鼻内镜下治疗鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者的效果。方法 80例鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者， 因护理方式不同可分为对照组和研究组， 每组40例。对照组患者行常规化护理， 研究组患者在对照组基础上行系统护理干预， 比较两组心理状态及护理满意度。结果 研究组术后2、3、4周汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评分分别为（21.46±4.86）、（13.46±4.48）、（8.57±3.77）分， 均低于对照组的（25.77±5.24）、（19.42±5.16）、（12.98±4.93）分， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。研究组患者就诊流程为（91.57±7.13）分， 疾病宣教为（92.64±6.92）分， 技术操作为（96.77±5.37）分， 工作态度为（92.64±6.44）分， 对照组患者就诊流程为（73.36±6.25）分， 疾病宣教为（77.76±6.32）分， 技术操作为（81.57±4.83）分， 工作态度为（86.13±5.76）分， 研究组护理满意度评分高于对照组， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者行系统护理干预可改善不良情绪， 提高护理满意度。 　　【关键词】 鼻窦炎；鼻息肉；系统护理干预 　　DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.08.074 　　【Abstract】 Objective To investigate effect by systematic nursing intervention for nasal endoscopic treatment in nasosinusitis nasal polyp patients. Methods Clinical data of 80 nasosinusitis nasal polyp patients were divided by different nursing measures into control group and research group， with 40 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing， and the research group received additional systematic nursing intervention to nursing in the control group. Comparison was made on psychological states and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. Results The research group had Hamilton depression scale （HAMD） scores in postoperative 2， 3， 4 weeks respectively as （21.46±4.86）， （13.46±4.48） and （8.57±3.77） points， which were all lower than （25.77±5.24）， （19.42±5.16）， and （12.98±4.93） points in the control group， and their difference had statistical significance （P0.05）. The research group had medical process score as （91.57±7.13） points， disease education score as （92.64±6.92） points， technical operation score as （96.77±5.37） points， and working attitude score as （92.64±6.44） points. The control group had medical process score as （73.36±6.25） points， disease education score as （77.76±6.32） points， technical operation score as （81.57±4.83） points， and working attitude score as （86.13±5.76） points. The research group had higher nursing satisfaction scores th