股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定临床分析.docVIP

股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定临床分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定临床分析

股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定临床分析   [摘要] 目的 探讨股骨粗隆间骨折闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗的临床效果。方法 随机选择2014年1月―2016年2月间的100例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,随机将其分成观察组与对照组(每组50例),对照组采取闭合复位DHS内固定治疗,观察组采取闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗,比较2组患者的手术情况、恢复情况以及术后并发症的情况。结果 ①观察组的手术时间较对照组短,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义[(37.52±7.92)min vs. (55.45±10.36)min, (30.16±4.87)mL vs. (73.09±10.58)mL](P0.05);②观察组伤口愈合时间较对照组短,下床活动时间较对照组提前,差异有统计学意义[(11.35±2.54)d vs. (15.37±2.82)d, (33.36±7.15)d vs. (40.54±7.83)d](P0.05);③观察组疗效优良率高于对照组(96.0% vs. 82.0%)(P0.05);④与对照组相比,观察组患者的并发症发生率更低(4.0% vs. 16.0%)(P0.05)。结论 股骨粗隆间骨折采取闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗,手术时间可明显缩短,患者术后愈合好,并发症发生率低,临床效果显著。   [关键词] 股骨粗隆间骨折;闭合复位;内固定;PFNA   [中图分类号] R687 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)05(b)-0069-03   [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effect of closed reduction PFNA internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 100 cases of patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated from January 2014 to February 2016 were andomly selected and randomly divided into two groups with 50 cases in each, the control group were treated with closed reduction DHS internal fixation, while the observation group were treated with closed reduction PFNA internal fixation, and the operation situation, recovery situation and postoperative complications situation were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the intraoperative bleeding amount was less than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant[(37.52±7.92)min vs (55.45±10.36)min, (30.16±4.87)mL vs(73.09±10.58)mL](P0.05), and the wound healing time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the time to get out of bed was shorter than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant[(11.35±2.54)d vs (15.37±2.82)d, (33.36±7.15)d vs (40.54±7.83)d](P0.05), and the excellent and good rate of curative effect in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(96.0%

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档