- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
莫匹罗星对血透患者中心静脉置管感染预防及治疗作用
莫匹罗星对血透患者中心静脉置管感染预防及治疗作用
[摘要] 目的 探讨莫匹罗星对血透患者中心静脉置管感染的预防及治疗作用。 方法 选取114例2013年7月~2014年7月期间来我院就诊并使用中心静脉导管治疗的血透患者,将所有患者分为两组。观察组57例,患者在血透治疗后,在常规换药后于中心静脉导管的出管口外用莫匹罗星治疗。对照组57例,使用常规换药方法治疗。对比两组患者的痊愈时间、感染发生率和治疗总有效率。 结果 观察组颈内静脉感染2例,感染率为3.5%,置管时间(22.42±5.22)d,股静脉感染3例,感染率5.3%,置管时间(19.16±3.13)d,锁骨下静脉感染2例,感染率3.5%,置管时间(29.23±4.92)d;对照组静脉感染6例,感染率为10.5%,置管时间(16.82±4.33)d,股静脉感染4例,感染率为7.0%,置管时间(15.26±3.88)d,锁骨下静脉感染4例,感染率7.0%,置管时间(19.65±4.68)d,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 静脉置管的导管口处外涂莫匹罗星能有效地降低中心静脉导管相关感染率,使患者的导管留置时间延长,患者易于接受,且费用较低,操作简便,值得推广。
[关键词] 莫罗匹星;中心静脉导管;血液透析;感染
[中图分类号] R459.5 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)14-0067-04
[Abstract] Objective To analyze and discuss the prevention and treatment effect of mupirocin on infection for hemodialysis patients with central venous catheterization (CVC). Methods A total of 114 cases hemodialysis patients receiving CVC in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2014 were randomly divided into two groups. 57 patients in the observation group were given externally mupirocin at the outlet of central venous catheter in addition to conventional medicine. 57 cases in the control group were given only conventional medicine. Healing time, incidence of infection and the total treatment efficiency of the two groups were compared. Results In the observation group, there were 2 cases of internal jugular vein infection with an infection rate of 3.5% and the average catheterization time was (22.42±5.22)d. And there were a total of 3 cases of femoral vein infection with an infection rate of 5.3% and the catheterization time was (19.16±3.13)d. Also there were 2 cases of subclavian vein infection with an infection rate of 3.5% and the catheterization time was (29.23±4.92)d; In the control group, there were a total of 6 cases of intravenous infection with an infection rate of 10.5% and the catheterization time was (16.82±4.33)d. And there were 4 cases of femoral vein infection with an infection rate of 7.0% and the catheterization time was (15.26±3.88)d. Also there
文档评论(0)