- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
舒适护理在人工流产围手术期应用效果比较
舒适护理在人工流产围手术期应用效果比较
【摘要】 目的:观察舒适护理在人工流产围手术期的应用效果。方法:选择在本科门诊手术室行人工流产术的128例患者,将其随机分为两组,舒适护理干预组(简称观察组)和常规护理干预组(简称对照组),每组各64例,护理干预后观察两组患者的抑郁、焦虑改善情况、护理满意度以及生活质量。结果:护理前,观察组患者的HAMD评分总分为(22.9±4.1)分,精神性因子分为(10.3±3.3)分,躯体性因子分为(14.5±3.8)分,与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。护理后,观察组患者的HAMD评分总分为(13.2±5.1)分,精神性因子分为(5.6±4.0)分,躯体性因子分为(7.0±2.1)分,均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。护理后,观察组患者的HAMA评分总分为(14.7±6.0)分,精神性因子分为(7.4±5.4)分,躯体性因子分为(8.2±4.6)分,均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。经护理干预后,观察组患者的满意度为92.19%,对照组为81.25%,观察组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者均无失访现象,观察组患者随访3个月时的PF得分(71.5±11.0)分,RP得分(74.1±13.7)分,RE得分(76.3±15.3)分,随访6个月时患者的PF得分(87.4±12.6)分,RP得分(86.5±11.7)分,RE得分(84.2±13.4)分;均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:舒适护理可有效降低人工流产术围手术期患者的抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高患者的护理满意度,有益于改善护患关系,提高生活质量。
【关键词】 人工流产术; 舒适护理; 护理满意度; 焦虑
Application Effect of Comfortable Nursing in the Perioperative Artificial Abortion/LIU Xiu-fang.//Medical Innovation of China,2014,11(32):085-087
【Abstract】 Objective:To observe the application effect of comfortable nursing care on the abortion operation period of artificial.Method:128 patients with artificial abortion were randomly divided into two groups,comfortable nursing intervention group(the observation group) and routine nursing group(control group),64 cases in each group, the anxiety condition and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were observed after the intervention.Result:Before nursing,HAMD score of the observation group was (22.9± 4.1)points,mental factor was (10.3±3.3),body factors was (14.5±3.8),compared with control group,there was no statistically significant difference(P0.05).After nursing,HAMD score of the observation group was (13.2±5.1), mental factor was (5.6±4.0), body factors was (7.0±2.1),which were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).After nursing,HAMA score of the observation group was (14.7±6.0) points, mental factor was(7.4±5.4), body factors was (8.2±4.6), which were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically
文档评论(0)