输尿管硬镜气压弹道碎石治疗肝内外胆管结石可行性及安全性研究.docVIP

输尿管硬镜气压弹道碎石治疗肝内外胆管结石可行性及安全性研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
输尿管硬镜气压弹道碎石治疗肝内外胆管结石可行性及安全性研究

输尿管硬镜气压弹道碎石治疗肝内外胆管结石可行性及安全性研究   [摘要] 目的 探究输尿管硬镜下气压弹道碎石与胆道镜下液电碎石术治疗肝内外胆管结石的临床疗效及安全性。 方法 选取我院2013年5月~2015年5月收治的复杂性肝内外胆管结石患者共82例,按照随机数表法将其随机分为对照组(n=40)与观察组(n=42)。对照组接受胆道镜下液电碎石术治疗,观察组接受输尿管硬镜下气压弹道碎石术治疗。比较两组患者手术一般情况,结石取净率及并发症情况。 结果 观察组手术操作时间及取石时间明显短于对照组(t=5.9922,6.5804,P0.05)。观察组术后结石取净率为71.4%,明显高于对照组的47.5%(χ2=4.8781,P0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为4.8%,明显低于对照组的25.0%(χ2=6.7171,P0.05)。 结论 输尿管硬镜下气压弹道碎石治疗肝内外胆管结石具有较好的临床效果,术后结石取净率较高,安全可靠,值得临床推广应用。   [关键词] 输尿管硬镜下气压弹道碎石;胆道镜下液电碎石;肝内外胆管结石   [中图分类号] R657.4+2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)02(b)-0038-03   Feasibility and safety study on ureteroscopic air-pressure ballistic lithotripsy in the treatment of intra- and extra-hepatic bile duct calculus   OU Yuan-xiang   The Second Department of Surgery,Dongfeng People′s Hospital of Zhongshan City in Guangdong Province,Zhongshan 528425,China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of ureteroscopic air-pressure ballistic lithotripsy and choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in treatment of intra-and extra-hepatic bile duct calculus. Methods 82 patients with complicated intra-and extra-hepatic bile duct calculus treated in our hospital from May 2013 to May 2015 were selected and randomly divided into the control group(n=40) and the observation group(n=42).Patients in the control group were treated by choledochoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy,while patients in the observation group were treated by ureteroscopic air-pressure ballistic lithotripsy.The general condition,total removal rate of calculus,and complications of two groups were compared. Results The time of operation and calculus removal in the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group respectively(t=5.9922,6.5804,P0.05).The total removal rate in the observation group was 71.4%,significantly higher than 47.5% in the control group (χ2=4.8781,P0.05).The incidence rate of complication in the observation group was 4.8%,which was significantly lower than 25.0% in the control g

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档