阿托伐他汀联合高压氧治疗慢性硬膜下血肿临床研究.docVIP

阿托伐他汀联合高压氧治疗慢性硬膜下血肿临床研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
阿托伐他汀联合高压氧治疗慢性硬膜下血肿临床研究

阿托伐他汀联合高压氧治疗慢性硬膜下血肿临床研究   [摘要] 目的 观察阿托伐他汀联合高压氧治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床疗效。 方法 将120例慢性硬膜下血肿患者随机分为治疗组60例和对照组60例。两组患者入组后均予高压氧治疗,治疗组在高压氧治疗基础上加用阿托伐他汀治疗,每次1片(20 mg),口服,每日1次,疗程8周。治疗2个月后,比较两组临床疗效和不良反应。比较治疗前后Barthel指数(BI)、改良Rankin评分(mRS)、临床症状和CT影像情况,评估临床疗效。 结果 治疗后,治疗组BI(79.2±12.6)分,mRS评分(1.6±0.5)分;对照组BI(68.3±11.2)分,mRS评分(2.4±1.3)分,两组治疗后BI及mRS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组总有效率为73.3%(44/60),对照组总有效率为55.0%(33/60),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组均未出现严重不良反应。 结论 临床上阿托伐他汀联合高压氧可有效治疗慢性硬膜下血肿,且安全性较好。   [关键词] 阿托伐他汀;高压氧;慢性硬膜下血肿;安全性   [中图分类号] R651.15 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)03-0019-03   Clinical study of atorvastatin combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma   YANG Fan ZHOU Gezhi TONG Minfeng   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinhua Central Hospital in Zhejiang Province, Jinhua 321000, China   [Abstract] Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of atorvastatin combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Methods 120 patients with chronic subdural hematoma were randomly divided into the treatment group(60 cases) and the control group(60 cases). Two groups of patients were treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The treatment group was further given atorvastatin on the basis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, with one tablet(20 mg) orally once a day for 8 weeks. After 2 months of treatment, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in the two groups were compared. Barthel Index (BI), modified Rankin score (mRS), clinical symptoms and CT imaging were compared before and after treatment to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Results After treatment, the BI was(79.2±12.6) points, and the mRS score was(1.6±0.5) points in the treatment group; the BI was(68.3±11.2) points, and the mRS score was(2.4±1.3) points in the control group. After comparing the BI and mRS score of the two groups, the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). The total effective rate in the treatment group was 73.3%(44/60), and 55.0% in the control group(3

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档