被追诉人程序选择权研究-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

被追诉人程序选择权研究-诉讼法学专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
被追诉人程序选择权研究-诉讼法学专业论文

II II Abstract The defendants option of procedure is a kind of litigious right , that is, according to the defendant’s meaning to started the criminal procedure to some extent,after apply it, he also can change this procedure and its related affairs .It includes three aspects :to start the criminal procedure; to agree or refuse the procedural propose; to change the criminal procedure. About the nature, the defendants option of procedure is not only one kind of rights of disposition, but also one kind of procedural rights too. The defendants option of procedure has four characteristics, free will, in condition of several proceeding, aggregation and proceeding determinant. The defendants option of procedure is not a kind of insignificant right. It has the strongest theory support. For example, theory of human rights protection, theory of subject of criminal proceeding, theory of relatively free will, theory of balance between charge and debate and theory of economical litigation are the important theoretical bases about its emergence and development, especially the first and second theory. Form our countrys current legislation to see, although it regulates the defendants criminal procedure option in guaranteed pending trial system, simplified judicial process, the peoples juror system and Victim-offender Mediation procedure, these regulations are simple, crude and nonactionable, which makes the defendant doesn’t choose the criminal procedure actively. Meanwhile, it makes the legislators original intention can’t reach. There are three reasons about this situation .Firstly, the influence of our country traditional litigation culture; Secondly, the influence of our country guiding ideology of criminal legislation and the traditional model of litigation; Thirdly, relative systems are unlikely to sustain the building of procedure option of the defendant. In order to change this situation, make the defendant really enjoy the right, and fully embody their status, at the

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档