- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
新生儿病房细菌感染状况分析及院内感染防控环节的研究
新生儿病房细菌感染状况分析及院内感染防控环节的研究
【摘要】 目的:探讨新生儿病房细菌感染状况以及院内感染防控环节。方法:选取2014年
4月-2017年2月本院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)存在感染的新生儿180例,随机将其分为观察组和对照组,各90例。所有患儿均根据细菌培养及药敏试验合理选择抗生素进行抗感染治疗,采集患儿防治前后粪便及咽拭子标本作细菌培养,监测产ESBL酶菌,分析比较两组患儿病原菌、平均住院时间、住院费用及死亡率。结果:入院72 h后,观察组患儿感染率为12.22%(11/90),虽低于对照组的14.44%(13/90),但差??无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组共检菌株11株,对照组共检菌株13株,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。入院72 h后,两组患儿咽拭子及粪便标本中ESBL菌检出率均低于入院当日,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:新生儿病房细菌感染主要以肺炎克雷伯杆菌和大肠埃希菌为主,经有效防治后,能够降低患儿感染率,减少其平均住院时间及住院费用,提高患儿存活率。
【关键词】 NICU; 细菌感染状况; 防控环节
Analysis of Bacterial Infection and Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infection in Neonatal Ward/WU Xiao-ying,ZHANG Xiao-li,CHEN Chun-ji.//Medical Innovation of China,2017,14(15):090-093
【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the status of bacterial infection in neonatal ward and the prevention and control of nosocomial infection.Method:180 newly diagnosed neonates with NICU in our hospital from April 2014 to February 2017 were selected,they were randomly divided into observation group and control group,90 cases in each group.All children were treated with antibiotics according to bacterial culture and drug sensitivity test,the stool and throat swabs were collected before and after the treatment for bacterial culture,and the ESBL producing strains were monitored,the pathogens,average hospital stay,hospital costs and mortality of two groups were analyzed and compared.Result:After 72 h,the infection rate of the observation group was 12.22%(11/90),which was lower than 14.44%(13/90) of the control group,but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05).A total of 11 strains were detected in the observation group,and the control group was examined with a total of 13 strains,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).After admission for 72 h,the detection rate of ESBL bacteria in throat swabs and stool specimens of the patients in the two groups was lower than those of admission,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).Conclu
文档评论(0)