- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
针刀治疗跟痛症35例的的疗效观察
针刀治疗跟痛症35例的的疗效观察
摘 要 目的:探讨针刀治疗跟痛症的应用及疗效。方法:将67例跟痛症患者(左足29例,右足36例,双侧5例)随机分为两组,治疗组33例,采用针刀治疗,7 d 1次,3次为1个疗程,1~2个疗程。对照组34例,采用电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗,隔日1次,5次为1个疗程,共2个疗程。疗程结束后,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较疗效结果。结果:治疗组治疗后及4个月后的VAS值分别为(1.06±1.27)分和(1.03±1.26)分,低于治疗前的(6.39±0.56)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.01);对照组则分别为(3.94±1.37)分和(3.94±1.28)分,低于治疗前的(6.71±0.80)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。两组间VAS值差异亦有统计学意义(P0.001)。结论:针刀治疗跟痛症有较好的临床疗效,明显优于电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗。
关键词 跟痛症 针刀疗法 电针疗法 特定电磁波谱
中图分类号:R246.2/R274.9 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1006-1533(2016)06-0030-02
Observation of the effect of acupotomy in the treatment of 35 cases of calcanodynia
ZHU Jing, CHEN Hua, PENG Lei, WANG Guohua
(Jinze Community Health Service Center of Qingpu District, Shanghai 201718, China)
ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the application and efficacy of acupotomy in the treatment of the calcanodynia. Methods: Sixty-seven of calcanodynia (29 cases of left foot, 36 cases of right foot, and 5 cases of bilateral feet) were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group with 33 cases were treated with acupotomy, 1 time per week, 3 times for a course, 1-2 courses. The control groups with 34 cases were treated with the electro-acupuncture instrument combined with specific electromagnetic spectrum (TDP), qod, 5 times for a course, 2 courses in total. After the termination of the treatment courses, the results were compared by visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The VAS value in the treatment group was decreased from(6.39±0.56)before treatment to (1.06±1.27) and (1.03±1.26) after the treatment and 4 months later, respectively, with significant dirrerence (P0.01), while the ones in the control group was decreased from (6.71±0.80)before treatment to (3.94±1.37) and(3.94±1.28), respectively, with significant dirrerence (P0.01). The differences had the statistical significance between the two groups (P0.001). Conclusion: Acupotomy has the good clinical effect in the treatment of calcanodynia, and is better than the electro-acupuncture instrument combined with TDP
文档评论(0)