股份公司股东大会召集制度研究-民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

- - 3 - 因此必须以董事会担任召集人为原则；法律既要对小股东进行特殊保护又 要防止其滥用权力，故应当以列举的方法明确监事会、少数股东充当召集 人的情形。 第三部分进一步研究了召集程序的各细节问题。在分析其他国家、地 区立法的同时结合我国相关立法，对通知主体、通知对象、通知形式、通 知期限、通知内容、董事会的协助义务等内容进行了详细阐述。该部分认 为，设计召集程序应当确保股东能够参加会议并有充分的时间、信息对将 要审议的提案进行判断、抉择，在此前提下，还应当尽可能地提高效率， 节省成本，让管理层能够毫无妨碍地发挥专业优势为公司服务，让股东能 够随时关注到自己的利益不被损害，让公司的资源不被浪费。 第四部分是对召集纠纷所涉及问题的解决方案。我国《公司法》仅针 对召集程序违反法律、行政法规和章程这一种召集纠纷允许股东提起撤销 之诉，对其他召集纠纷则没有提供任何解决方法。而且，仅赋予股东事后 的撤销权，而不提供事前预防方案，也不能迅速、有效地解决各方争端。 该部分对股东提起撤销之诉的性质、原告资格、被告身份、是否需要提供 担保、撤销的效力等事宜进行了论述，并针对“双股东大会”设计了“合并召 开股东大会”的方案来预防召集纠纷，力求设计一种科学、效率、公平的方 案来事前解决“表决相同或相似提案而召开的数个股东大会”的问题。 关键词：股东大会 召集制度 价值 救济 - - PAGE 1 - Abstract With the undergoing reform of share holding system and the development in stock market, there is an increasing claim for the protection of shareholders both in academic and practice. Corporate Law, which has been revised for several times, is still too sketchy. Only a few articles are in relating to the procedures of the shareholders’ meeting and they are proved to be unpractical. Although Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission has imposed the Rules for the General Assemblies of Shareholders of Listed Companies and other regulations, but they don’t go into details and some of them are not in accordance with Corporate Law. Therefore disputes keep arising due to contradictory regulations and laws. Judiciary, however, seems helpless when dealing with these disputes. More prudential regulations should be established to the best of judiciary and supervision institutions. The article studies the convening system of shareholders’ meeting and includes four parts. It discusses the concept, the legal value and the goal of convening system and makes an analysis on the aspects of the subject, object and procedure. There is also a comparison between the legislation in China and the counterparts in other countries and regions. Firstly the article deals with the general theory of the convening system. The convening of shareholders’ meeting is not the shareholders’ right but overa