公共官员隐私权的限制和保护民法专业论文.docx

1 1 2 2 Abstract China has not put forward the concept of public officials, and the research about the privacy of public officials is more rare . At the same time, the right of privacy is not an independent right of personality in China, but attached to under the protection of reputation. Those situations make the protection for public officials’ privacy one disaster after another. Public officials of citizenship and political identity double cross also means that the privacy right of public officials conflict between the right to know, and freedom of expression.The conflict present increasingly direct, intensification and development of complicated situation. How to find a best balance point in the law, not only satisfy the public demand for democratic political supervision, promote the development of public interest, but also do not sacrifice the innocent public officials personal legal privacy interests, this paper seeks to explore the problem .In this paper, in addition to the introduction and thanking, the text consists of four parts: The first part: Analysis of the privacy of public officials. By discussing the concept of public officials fist formed in the United States, I pointed out that the academic circles in China definition of the concept of public figure with U.S. law related to the concept of the public person, public figure and public officials to clarify the author stance : our academic circles should clarify the concept of public officials, and discussed the two concepts of public figure and public officials should not be regarded as the same.They have big difference between the connotation and the protection measures. In China, public officials can be understood as follows: the elected government officials, as well as the implementation of the responsibilities of the terms of reference will have a certain impact on public interest. Civil servant, national staff and other related concepts as the connotation and the extension of public officials are