技术顾问制度中国化研究-刑侦学专业论文.docxVIP

PAGE PAGE 3 律地位、选任模式、资格认定等作了相关探讨，尤其在对技术顾问的选任模式上提出了 既不同于大陆法系与英美法系国家所采用的模式、也不同于中国现阶段学术界与实践中 所采用的模式，而是提出了一种新的观点。那就是根据三大诉讼自身特点对选任模式进 行“量体裁衣”，采取不同的选任方式——在刑事诉讼中采取“公权力部门介入为辅,犯 罪嫌疑人自主选任为主”模式、 在行政诉讼中采取“原告方主导，法官辅助纠正”模 式、在民事诉讼中采取“当事人申请为辅，法官裁定为主”模式。在本部分最后对技术 顾问在程序方面作了相关介绍，以防整个技术顾问制度因不具有操作性而流于形式。 关键词：技术顾问；鉴定制度；两大法系比较；中国化模式设计 Abstract In addition to the introduction of this paper, the divided into four parts: The first part describes a general overview of the technical adviser, after integrating some concepts, proposes a new definition of technical adviser. On this basis, comparing the concept with other concepts (appraisers, witnesses, legal representatives) from the nature， time, and function, especially distinguishing it with else legal participators from the function ,in the purpose of preventing confusion. In final of this part, describing the concept of technical advisers systems, and analyzing other appraisers related concept on a whole, considering the development of appraisers systems as the basis of raising of technical advisers, the division of the field of appraisers system provides the conditions for the selection of technical advisers, the judge, litigant which wanting to review the scientific reliability becoming the direct cause for raising of technical adviser. The second part is that after the writer collecting a large number of data, comprehensively comparing the related laws of the civil law systems states (France, Italy, Germany)and the British US Law systems states(the United States, United Kingdom). Due to the characteristics of the Italian civil law system with the characteristics of Chinas legal system is similar, the writer focusing on researching technical advisers systems from the denomination, types, selection means, legal status, qualifications and other aspects. That needs to be emphasized is that the law of Italian qualifications of technical advisers is worthy of accepting, which tries to expand the scope of adviser and reducing restrictions,