民事检察调查核实权问题研究-法律学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

I I 摘 要 摘 要 修改后的民事诉讼法将检察机关在民事诉讼监督中正式完成了关于调查核实权的 立法工作，在该法的第二百一十条里，指出“在进行法律监督的职责的履行时，人民检 察院若有抗诉或检察建议的需要提出，那么其能够就相关情况向案外人或当事人核实调 查。”对民事监督诉讼里检察机关所具有的调查核实权的明确是这次民诉法修改的一大 亮点，尽管用字不多，但对调查核实权的适用对象，调查目的、适用范围等都做出了关 键性的规定。有了这样的规定，检察机关的监督范围得以扩大、监督方式得以增加、监 督手段进一步强化，检察机关的法律监督的地位也愈益增强，这对其所具有的法律监督 的职责的更好履行而言意义重大，为全面正确开展地民事行政检察工作奠定了更为坚实 的法律基础。但是，对检察机关在民事诉讼监督中调查核实权的法律涵义、适用范围、 调查方式、法律效果评价等问题在学术界和实务界一直存在争议，即使在民事诉讼法修 改后仍然有着较大的分歧，这些问题不同程度上制约了检察机关正确履行法律监督职 责。随着民事诉讼法的逐步实施，这些矛盾需要得到尽快的解决。本文试从检察机关调 查核实权的法律来源、制度特色以及作者本人在检察机关民事行政检察部门多年的工作 经历出发，联系相关的法律规定和自身的体会，对检察机关在民事诉讼监督中如何更好 地开展调查核实工作作出一些积极的分析与构想，并提出一些相应的意见建议，以企为 司法实践中的检察监督工作提供理论支持。 关键词 民事诉讼监督 调查核实 调查取证 调查 II II Abstract Abstract The civil procedure law amended the procuratorial organs investigation of nuclear power in the supervision of civil lawsuit in the formal written into legislation, the civil procedure law stipulates that the 210th peoples Procuratorate for the performance of the legal responsibilities of supervision required procuratorial suggestions or protest, can the party or an outsider investigations to verify the situation. The prosecutor to investigate nuclear power in civil litigation supervision is a highlight of this procedure revision, although the word is not much, but the applicable object of investigation and verification of the right, the purpose of investigation, the scope of the provisions are made key. With such a provision, the procuratorial organs supervision range to expand, to increase supervision, supervision means to further strengthen, the legal status of procuratorial supervision, which is more prominent, is of great significance for the procuratorial organs to better fulfill there sponsibility of legal supervision, to correct development of civil administrative procuratorial work laid more the solid legal foundation. However, the issue of legal meaning, the procuratorial organs in the supervision of civil lawsuit in the right to investigate and verify the applicable scope, investigation, legal effect evaluat