论民事再审程序中第三人撤销之诉-法律(民事诉讼法)专业论文.docxVIP

摘要再审程序，是为了纠正已经发生法律效力裁判中的错误而对案件再次进行审理的程序。它 摘要 再审程序，是为了纠正已经发生法律效力裁判中的错误而对案件再次进行审理的程序。它 是民事诉讼程序制度中的一项补救制度，是民事诉讼程序制度中不可缺少的一个组成部分。我 国民事诉讼法设置了当事人申请再审程序，赋予当事人直接向法院申请再审的权利。同时还规 定了人民法院自行决定再审和人民检察院抗诉两种审判监督形式。但在现有再审制度下，案外 第三人在因生效判决错误而遭受不利时，很难对自己的合法权利进行救济。本文通过分析我国 民事诉讼法缺乏对受判决不利影响的案外第三人的程序保障和执行程序中案外第三人执行异 议制度的不足，借鉴台湾、法国等的第三人撤销之诉制度，提出在我国民事诉讼程序中设立第 三人撤销之诉。第三人撤销之诉是指当某一生效判决或调解使第三人的利益受到侵害时，第三 人请求撤销判决或变更判决的诉讼。它是程序法上为保护案外第三人利益而进行的事后救济程 序的安排，我国民事诉讼法立法确认这一制度有其必要性和正当性。 关键词：案外第三人再审判决效力程序保障 ABSTRACTIn ABSTRACT In order to correct mistake in the effective judgment,the review procedure is carried on once more to the case tries．It is a recovery system and also an essential constituent in the civil action procedure system．The review procedure is established in the civil procedure law of our country by endowing the litigant with the right to apply for the review to the court．Simultaneously two kind of trials surveillance forms are stipulated，one by the People’S court，the other by the People’S Procuratorate．But under the existing review system，the third party who is not involved in the original trial is difficult to protect his own lawful right when he suffers disadvantageously in the effective judgment．The author compares the system of the third party in the civil procedure law with opposition to execution in the execution procedure and analyzes them in the article．The author suggests that the third party system in France，Taiwan region can be used for reference to construct the procedure of discharging the judgment by the third party not involved in the original trial in our civil action procedure．The lawsuit of discharging the judgment by the third party means that the third party requests discharging or changing the judgment when his interests is violated by an effective judgment or Mediation．It is an afterwards relief arrangement to defend the interest of the third party．It is necessary and just to confirm the system in civil procedure law of our country． Key words：the third party who is