我国跨境电子取证制度现实考察与完善路径.docVIP

精品文档，助力人生，欢迎关注小编！ 我国跨境电子取证制度现实考察与完善路径 我国跨境电子取证制度的现实考察与完善路径 Practical Investigation and Improvement of Cross-border Electronic Forensics System in China 作 者： 叶媛博 作者简介： 叶媛博(1987- )，女，安徽阜阳人，广东警官学院讲师，中山大学法学博士，研究方向：经济法、经济犯罪（广州 510003）。 原文出处： 《河北法学》(石家庄)20XX 年第 20XX11 期 第 106-119 页 内容提要： 跨境电子证据取证是涉外网络犯罪案件取证的重要环节，我国当前跨境电子证据取证制度以司法实践经验为蓝本构建，具有取证效率高、可操作性强的特点，但却与我国在国际社会主张的“网络主权原则”不相符，且超出上位法以“刑事司法协助”开展跨境取证的规定。同时，我国跨境电子取证还面临着域外挑战，特别是美国 20XX 年出台《澄清合法使用境外数据法》，授权本国司法机构通过云服务提供者获取境外电子数据，并以“适格主体”的形式向境外其他国家对美国境内电子数据取证设置高门槛，对此，欧盟也表态将着手开展相关立法。一旦这些域外立法发挥效力，我国跨境电子取证工作将陷于被动。为长远计，我国应当正视当前跨境电子证据取证制度存在的问题，在坚持和完善“网络主权原则”的基础上，修改现行法律制度相关内容，出台配套的法律法规，形成权威、高效、完备的跨境电子证据取证制度，指导和保障我国日益增多的跨境网络犯罪打击和防范工作，回应国际社会电子数据主权之争。 Cross-border electronic evidence collection is an important part of evidence collection in foreign-related cybercrime cases.Chinas current cross-border electronic evidence collection system stems from judicial practice experience and has the characteristics of high evidence-acquisition efficiency and operability,but it is not match with the “Cyber Sovereignty Principle” which is insisted by China in the international community.And it exceeds the provisions of the upper-level law to conduct cross-border evidence collection in the form of “criminal justice assistance.” At the same time,cross-border e-discovery in China is also facing extraterritorial challenges.In 20XX,the United States issued the “Clarification of the Law on the Legal Use of Overseas Data”,In this regard,the EU also stated that it will proceed with relevant legislation.Once these extraterritorial legislations are effective,Chinas cross-border e-discovery work will be passive.China should face up to the problems existing in the current cross-border electronic evidence collection system.Revise the relevant contents of the current legal system,introduce supporting laws and regulations,and form an authoritative,efficient and complete The cross-border electronic evidence collection system guides an