球鞋技术论文.docxVIP

球鞋技术论文 国内外知名篮球鞋力学性能的实验研究 摘 要: 目的:了解国内外二款知名篮球鞋“耐克”全掌气垫篮球鞋和“安踏” 非气垫篮球 鞋的力学性能,评价力学功效。方法:以实验法测试二款知名篮球鞋的力学性能。结果:二 款知名篮球鞋的压力测试表明,几乎所有的被试者“鞋-地”界面平均压力与峰值压力“安 踏”鞋比“耐克”鞋稍高,但二款篮球鞋“鞋-地”界面的平均压力与峰值压力值都不存在 显著性差异P0.05;纵跳实验表明,“安踏”鞋纵跳高度稍高于“耐克”鞋,二 者之 间并无统计学上的差异;摩擦系数实验表明,“耐克”鞋的动静摩擦系数优于“安踏”鞋的 动静摩擦系数,二者的的动静摩擦系数之间存在统计学上的差异P0.05。 关键词:知名篮球鞋;耐克全掌气垫篮球鞋;安踏非气垫篮球鞋;力学性能 中图分类号:G804.61文献标识码:A文章编 号:1007-3612202105-0059-03 An Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Well-known Bas ketball Shoes at Home and Abroad QIU Qiner1,LU Yichen2,LI Jianshe3 1.Department of Physical Education, Ningbo University, Ningb o 315211, Zhejiang China;2.Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, Zh ejiang China; 3.Zhejiang College of Sports, Hangzhou 311123, Zhejiang C hina Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore mechanical properties and eva luate mechanical effect of the wellknown foreign fullpalmair basketball sh oes of the Nike and domestic nonair basketball shoes of Anta. The method is to conduct experiment on the mechanical properties of these shoes. The stres s tests show that, almost all mean pressure and peak pressure of Anta was slight ly higher than Nike on “shoesgroundindicators, but the average pressure an d peak pressure value does not exist significant differencesP0.05. Thevertical jump tests show that the height of vertical jump of Anta was slightly higher than the Nike but without significant difference. The friction coefficie nt tests show that dynamic or static friction coefficient of Nike is superior th an Anta, and the dynamic or static friction coefficient does exist significant d ifferencesP0.05. Key words: well-known basketball shoes; full-palm-air basketball shoes o f Nike; non-air basketball shoes of Anta; mechanical properties 中国是世界上最大的运动鞋生产和制造基地,在如今全球范围内,每两双运动鞋中就有 一双是中国制造的。国内著名品牌运动鞋在最近两年内适应市场专业细分后,开始了自己真 正的专业开发,但其专业性能无法与Nike、Adidas、Asics、Reebok等国际品牌相抗衡。中 国的运动鞋品牌公司很少有自己的研发中心,基本上还是处于产品开发的水平,根本没有自 己的运动生物力学、生理学、运动学的研究机构支撑其品牌的专业化发展,更多以