- 4
- 0
- 约4.48万字
- 约 38页
- 2017-09-16 发布于安徽
- 举报
摘 要
竞争是市场经济的第一要义和本质特征,是促进资源优化配置,保护消费者
权益的最佳方式。但是竞争也是一把双刃剑,发展到一定阶段就导致了垄断的产
生,垄断行为排除、限制竞争,然而传统的民法对此无能为力,于是反垄断法应
运而生。 法律自身价值的实现有赖与构建与之配套的相应实施制 ,法律规则本
身的原则性、抽象性与不断变化的社会生活状况之间的磨合只有通过法律实施才
能解决。
纵观世界各国,反垄断法的实施方式根据执法主体不同可分为公共实施和私
人实施,二者各有千秋也各有缺陷。公共执法由于种种原因执法效果并不十分理
想,力不从心。虽然我国已经确立了反垄断法私人实施制 ,但法条规定十分概
括,并没有明确规定其实施的具体细则,导致操作起来困难重重。随着经济的发
展,我国的市场垄断现象越来越严重, 争是市场经济的灵魂,破坏竞争最终必
然导致整个市场经济的瘫痪。所以针对我国国情,建立和完 反垄断法私人实施
制 非常必要。
本文通过采用比较分析法和文献分析法来阐述反垄断私人实施的基本理论以
及其在国外如美国和欧盟地区的实践与经验,分析我国反垄断法执行的现状与不
足,指出完 反垄断私人实施的必要性,并对此做出了初步的制 设想。比如,
完 我国反垄断法私人实施制 首先要从立法上给予有力支持。在实践过程中,
要建立惩罚性赔偿机制来提高私人提起反垄断民事诉讼的积极性和对相关企业进
行威慑。由于垄断行为本身的复杂性,在审理相关案件时会涉及到许多专业问题,
所以管辖权这部分需要尽可能的专业化等等问题本文都做了详细论述,以期为我
国的反垄断法事业提供小小献礼。
关键词】反垄断法;私人实施;制度完
3
Abstract
Competition is the essence and the nature of the market economy, is to promote the
optimal allocation of resources, the best way to protect the rights and interests of
consumers. But the competition is also a double-edged sword, has developed to a
certain stage will lead to a monopoly, monopoly to exclude, restrict competition, but the
traditional civil law are incapable of action, so the anti-monopoly law emerge as the
times require. Implementation of legal value and construct the corresponding
implementation depends on the system and the matching between social life condition,
principle, abstract and changing rules of law itself the running-in can operate only
through legal.
Throughout the world, the implementation of anti-monopoly law mode according
to the law enforcement main body can be divided into public enforcement and private
enforcement, the two also have defects of each has its own merits. The public
enforcement due to various reasons, law enforcement effect is not very ideal, ambition.
原创力文档

文档评论(0)