缔约过失责任的法经济学研究.pdfVIP

要 缔约过失责任理论的产生是对大陆法系传统契约理 的重大突破，给传统的 契约法理 带来了巨大的冲击。经过一百多年的发展，缔约过失责任理 体系已 相对成熟，我国1999 年通过的新合同法则是对这一制度做出了较全面的确认。但 对于缔约过失责任的理 基础 诚实信用原则，目 仍缺乏一个统一的标准， 因而需要不断地创新理论，进行制度创新建设，使这项法律制度日益完善日趋完 备。本文结合法经济学的相关理论，以缔约过失责任中先合同义务为切入点，从 效率和公平两个角度对该问题进行研究。在研究的过程中，笔者运用比较法对比 了大陆法系与英美法系对诚实信用原则的不同规定；适当将定量分析导入对缔约 过失责任构成要件的分析，从而使法律分析更加精确;跳出传统对先合同义务的法 学分析，创新地结合不完备合同理论对先合同义务展开经济学分析；融合科斯定 理和波斯纳定理，以效率优先兼顾公平为原则重新界定告知义务中的信息产权； 最后从个人理解层面提出几点改进我国缔约过失责任制度的建议。 关键词：缔约过失责任 信赖利益 不完备合同 先合同义务 信息产权 1 Abstract The liability of signing contract defect theory of a civil law family is a major breakthrough in contract theory, and has brought tremendous impact to the traditional theory of contract law. After 100 years of development, the liability of signing contract defect theory has been relatively mature. Adopted by the new law of contract in 1999 for the system to make a more comprehensive confirmation. However, the basis of the liability of signing contract defect theory the principle of good faith, is still a lack of a unified standard, which requires constant innovation theory, system innovation in order to improve the legal system increasingly becoming increasingly complete. In this paper, the combination of economics and law theory, to the duty of the prior-contract of liabilities for the entry point, from the perspective of both efficiency and equity of the issue be studied. In the course of study, the authors compared the use of comparative law and civil law family general law family principle of good faith on the different requirements; appropriate to quantitative analysis of import duty on the parties to a fault element analysis, thus enabling more precise legal analysis; Bounce Traditional contractual obligations to the first analysis of the law,