论民事诉讼中的当事人陈述制度.pdfVIP

摘 要 当事人的陈述在性质上具有双重性，既是当事人的主张，是待证明的对象， 又有当事人对案件事实的直接描述，是法官审理案件的证据资料。当事人的陈述 对于查清案件事实十分重要，直接影响到案件裁判的结果，在民事诉讼中具有极 其重要的地位，对其进行深入的理论探讨，设立必要的制度，以保障其得以恰当 的适用，显然非常必要。虽然我国民事诉讼法将当事人陈述规定为证据的一 ， 但在理论上对当事人陈述的基本含义尚未厘清，对当事人陈述的功能缺乏应有的 探讨。在西方国家几千年漫长的法律发展中，逐步形成了较完善的证据体系，对 当事人陈述也有完整的制度来保证其作为证据的效力，如当事人听取、当事人询 问、宣誓、对虚假陈述的制裁等等。本文正是基于当事人在民事诉讼中的双重角 色，在对立法和实践中存在的问题进行评析的基础上，通过对外国当事人陈述制 度的比较考察，对我国当事人陈述制度进行反思、重构。 关键词：民事诉讼 当事人陈述 当事人询问 当事人听取 1 Abstract The parties statement has double nature, not only the advocate of the parties , the object to be testify, but also the direct presentation of the facts, the evidence information of cases. It is so important for finding out the truth that the judgment is affected by it. Considering its great position in the civil litigation, it is necessary to make a theory research on it and found systems to ensure it being used properly. Although it s a type of evidence in Civil Procedural Act, the implication hasn t been clarified and the function hasn t been researched enough. While in the western countries, after thousands of years of development, there is a perfect evidentiary system and complete regulations to guarantee its effect as an evidence, such as hearing parties, examining parties, oath and measures of punishing the parties who make dishonest presentation. The parties statement is been reflected and reconstructed in this paper, after probing into the double role in civil litigation, analyzing the problems in legislation and administration of law, studying the rules of the parties statement in the foreign countries. Key words: civil litigation, the parties statement, examining parties, hearing parties 2 目 录 引言·····