无张力疝修补与传统疝修补术治疗腹外疝的临床对比研究.DOCVIP

无张力疝修补与传统疝修补术治疗腹外疝的临床对比研究.DOC

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床医学论文-无张力疝修补与传统疝修补术治疗腹外疝的临床对比研究 ??????????作者:何建军,许克勤,汤建华,刘常岳,李宗浩, ?????? 文霞初,刘及时,? 朱文胜,蔡银忠,张建凯,吴闽华 [摘要]? 目的? 探讨无张力疝修补术治疗腹外疝的临床效果。方法? 回顾分析2003年7月~2005年12月无张力疝修补78例(A组),传统疝修补417例(B组),对比分析两组临床资料。结果? (1)平均手术时间:A组50 min,B组61 min;两组差异无显著性(χ2=3.0356,P0.05);(2)平均住院日:A组4.3天,B组9.1天,两组差异有显著性(χ2=10.5996,P0.005);(3)平均医疗费用:A组3980.2元,除外材料费2000.2元,B组2097.13元,两组差异无显著性(χ2=2.056,P0.05);(4)平均术后下床活动时间:A组12.4 h,B组192.4 h,两组差异有显著性(χ2=11.3459,P0.005);(5)平均术后恢复日常活动时间:A组4天,B组59天,两组差异有显著性(χ2=13.1575,P0.005);(6)术后并发症:A组29.5%,B组57.3%,两组差异有显著性(χ2=19.3209,P0.005);(7)术后复发:A组1.17%,B组18.0%,两组差异有显著性(χ2=5.002,P0.05)。结论? 腹外疝无张力疝修补平均手术时间、除外修补材料的平均医疗费用与传统疝修补相等;平均住院日、平均术后下床活动时间、平均术后恢复日常活动时间、术后并发症及术后复发率明显低于传统疝修补术;降低修补材料费后无张力疝修补术是治疗中老年腹外疝、复发疝及有并发症的腹外疝的最佳术式。  [关键词]? 无张力修补;传统修补;腹外疝;外科手术 ? ?? Clinical comparison on tension-free hernioplasty with traditional hernioplasty in treating abdominal outer hernia ??? ??? [Abstract]? Objective? To evaluate the clinical effect of tension-free hernioplasty in treatment of abdominal outer hernia.Methods? Clinical data of 78 cases with tension-free hernioplasty (A group) and 417 cases with traditional hernioplasty (B group) in the patients with abdominal outer hernia from July 2003 to December 2005 were analyzed retrospectively.Results? (1)A group were 50 min and B group were 61 min for average operation times,two groups were not have difference (χ2=3.0356,P0.05);(2)A group were 4.3 d and B group were 9.1 d for average inpatient days,two groups were significant difference (χ2=10.5996,P0.05);(3)A group were 2000.2 yuan (subtraction material cost) and B group were 2097.13 yuan for average expenses,two groups have not difference (χ2=2.0561,P0.05);(4)A group were 12.4 h and B groups were 192.4 h for average times of bed down move after operation,two groups were significant difference (χ2=11.3459,P0.005);(5)A group were 4 d and B group were 59 d for average times of resume everyday move after operation,two groups were significant difference (χ2=13.1575,P0.005);(6)A group were

文档评论(0)

fengyu11 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档