Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel Method and IRT method of detecting DIF.docVIP

下载本文档

10
0
约3.57万字
约 56页
2017-09-01 发布于湖北
举报
版权申诉

Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel Method and IRT method of detecting DIF.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel Method and IRT method of detecting DIF By Xinting Zhao Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel Method and IRT method of detecting DIF ABSTRACT In this study, the author studied the Differential Item Functioning (DIF) of the S dimension and N dimension of MBTI test. The grouping criteria are major (Library Science/Science Technology) and working period (less than 1 year/more that 1 year). The subjects of this study are 1010 persons who took the MBTI test online. All subjects have completed the whole test. The numbers of the two major subjects are approximately same and so are the numbers of the subjects in different working period. The research used two different DIF methods, Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square method and IRT method to study the DIF of two grouping design upon the two dimensions. The study result shows that on the major group, both the S and the N dimension of the MBTI test have a big portion of DIF items. In addition, the result shows that the DIF of both dimensions on working period group are also high. The result further shows that that on the sex group, the number of the DIF item on N dimension is approximately the same as S dimension, whereas on the major group, the DIF items in N dimension is higher than S dimension. Moreover, the study compares the M-H method and IRT method and discovers that IRT method is more sensitive in studying the sensitivity. In determining the item preference, about 35% items show different preference in different methods. Finally, the study compares the difference of the test mechanism of achievement test and personality test. The study did not use the common technology of potential layering in achievement test, but use the global validation instead. The study result shows that this method is more practical in studying the dimension DIF in MBTI test. KEY WORDS: Differential Item Functioning, Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square, IRT DIF model, MBTI 目录 1 文献综述 1 1.1 测验效度 2 1.1.1 传统效度理论以及结构效度 2 1.1.2 现代的效度理论 3 1.2