脉冲与稳态噪声对工人听力影响的meta分析.pdfVIP

2011 海峡两岸职业卫生学术研讨会论文集 [8] Fukudo S , Suzuki J. Colonic motility, autonomic function, and gastrointestinal hormones under psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1987, 151(4):373-385. [9] 穆振斌, 黄宇新, 赵保民, 等. 枪击噪声对大鼠胃肠传输固体食物的影响及其机制 探讨. 解放军医学杂志, 2005，30(2):145-146. 脉冲与稳态噪声对工人听力影响的 meta 分析 1 1 1 1 2 朱博 , 孙明伟 , 王新 , 李利 , 刘茁 【摘要】 目的 探讨脉冲与稳态噪声对工人听力的影响。方法 利用中国学术期刊全文数 据库、万方全文数据库及中国生物医学文献数据库，检索1990年1月到2010年12月国内公开发 表的关于脉冲与稳态噪声对工人听力影响的研究文献采用Meta分析的方法，应用随机效应模型 和固定效应模型进行综合的定量分析，计算合并OR值及其95%CI，利用倒漏斗法定性评价发表 性偏倚。结果 纳入Meta分析的文献共8篇，听损人数方面，合并的OR值为3.29，95%CI为（1.86， 5.84）；听损耳数方面，合并的OR值为2.59，95%CI为（1.93，3.47）。说明脉冲噪声对人体听 力的损伤高于稳态噪声。结论 表明脉冲噪声比稳态噪声对人体危害性大，提示我们在噪声的 防治过程中应有所区别、有所侧重。 【关键词】脉冲噪声；稳态噪声；听力损伤；Meta分析 The Association between Noise and Emotional States: A Meta-analysis ZHU Bo, WANG Xin, SUN Ming-wei, et al. Liaoning Academy of Safety Science Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China 【Abstract】Objective To investigate the effect on audibility exposure from and impulse noise. Methods The articles were identified by searching CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases from January 1990 to December 2010. A Meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio and their 95% CI, which to estimate the difference between steady state noise and impulse noise. Results A total of 8 relevant literatures that was suitable for the inclusion criteria were included for Meta-analysis. In the incidence of people, the odds ratio is 3.29(1.86, 5.84); In the incidence of ears, the odds ratio is 3.29(1.93, 3.47). It is indicated that the risk of the impulse noise group was significantly higher than that of the steady state noise group. Conclusion It showed that the impulse noise that compared to the steady state noise, has great harm to humans, it suggested that our noise contr