- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同剂量瑞舒伐他汀对颈动脉粥样硬化合并高血脂患者疗效及安全性的对照分析.pdf
2012 16 11
Journal of Clinical Medicin e in Practice 27
钱雪松
( , , 2 15600)
: ,
2008 5 ~ 2011 5 110 , 5 mg ( A ) 10 mg
( B ) 20mg ( C ) , 3 T CT GHDL- CLDL- C -
, 3 - ( P 0.
01) ; TCTGLDL- C ( P 0. 01) , HDL- C ( P 0. 01) C B ; B A
( P 0. 05 P 0. 01) 3
, , , , 3
,
: ; ; ; ; -
: R 5892 : A : 1672- 2353( 2012) 11- 0027- 03
Efficacy and safety of different doses of rosuvastatin
on carotid atherosclerosis patients complicated with
hyperlipidemia: A comparative study
QIAN Xue- song
(Zhangj iag ang N o. 1 P eop les H osp ital, Zhangj iag ang , Jiangsu , 2 15600)
ABSTRA T: Objective T o ob erve the efficacy and afety of different do e of ro uva tatin in
carotid athero clero i patient complicated w ith hyperlipidemia, and conduct a com parative analy-
i . Methods A total of 110 carotid athero clero i patient complicated with hyperlipidem ia from
M ay 2008 to May 2011 were elected and randomly divided into ro uva tatin 5mg group ( group A) ,
10 mg group ( group B) , and 20 mg group ( group C) . T he medicine wa adm ini tered after dinner.
T he change of T C, T G, HDL- C, LDL- C, carotid plaque area, neck intima- media thickne
( IMT) in the three group w ere compared and the incidence of adver e event w ere recorded. Re-
sults The carotid plaque area and carotid intima - media thickne w ere ig nificantly reduced ( P
0. 01) , T C, T G, LDL- C w ere ignif icantly lowered ( P 0. 01) and H DL- C w ere ig nificant-
ly increa ed ( P 0. 01) in all three group . But the overall efficacy rate in group C w a better than
in group B, and group B better than group A ( P 0. 05 or P 0. 01) . No obviou adver e event
w ere found in all the th
文档评论(0)